Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 8 Mar 2008 18:08:23 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m28H8MDH019642 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 18:08:22 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m28GnNNw000886 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:49:23 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m27N1GkO032112; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:53:57 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 211730 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:53:56 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m28Gru72014772 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:53:56 +0100 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.179]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m28Gn7PF000735 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:49:11 +0100 Received: from morse.mittelbach-online.de (p4FD44CAE.dip.t-dialin.net [79.212.76.174]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu8) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML31I-1JY2Ix3oFT-0002hO; Sat, 08 Mar 2008 17:53:52 +0100 Received: by morse.mittelbach-online.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id F237762E65; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:53:48 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <85wsoeto1k.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <18385.42387.268037.81145@morse.mittelbach-online.de> <85skz2rzpg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <18385.47367.235186.436845@morse.mittelbach-online.de> <854pbiru5z.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.3.1 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+SWRxsjUnhI0cNRFvaDEBqmdWNblUpSYJBjjd qONTXnEohvT1+cSp0kOzQNe7GoavdodWELVSh5MIRxhhrsK1qD Didix+3Nvmt6DribTqwDV4vGaAAlSDe X-Spam-Whitelist-Provider: Message-ID: <18386.50332.562898.876072@morse.mittelbach-online.de> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:53:48 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Frank Mittelbach Subject: Re: Unclosed groups -- Was: Re: A really, really bad bug. To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -102.464 () BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,USER_IN_WHITELIST X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Mar 2008 17:08:23.0574 (UTC) FILETIME=[04563360:01C8813F] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5182 William, > If I may be permitted to make a remark from the sidelines: > > > I don't like this solution since it would still trigger save stack > > overflow when there is an unclosed group at the end of the document. > > > > I quite prefer the usual warning about an open group at the end of > > document over having a save stack capacity overflow triggered. > > Unclosed groups are likely obstacles for translation of LaTeX to > formats like the usual tex4ht targets. I don't think that David meant that an unclosed group should be ignored, but that it is better to to get "document ended while group xyz open" than to bomb with a stack overflow (for the same reason but harder to understand). frank