References: <85wsoeto1k.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
            <18385.42387.268037.81145@morse.mittelbach-online.de>
            <85skz2rzpg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
            <18385.47367.235186.436845@morse.mittelbach-online.de>
            <854pbiru5z.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.4 (usg-unix-v)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID:  <i7hcfh2rmf.fsf_-_@hilbert.math.albany.edu>
Date:         Sat, 8 Mar 2008 09:54:32 -0500
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: William F Hammond <hammond@CSC.ALBANY.EDU>
Subject: Unclosed groups -- Was: Re: A really, really bad bug.
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
In-Reply-To:  <854pbiru5z.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Sat,
              8 Mar 2008 00:28:08 +0100")
Precedence: list
Status: R

If I may be permitted to make a remark from the sidelines:

> I don't like this solution since it would still trigger save stack
> overflow when there is an unclosed group at the end of the document.
>
> I quite prefer the usual warning about an open group at the end of
> document over having a save stack capacity overflow triggered.

Unclosed groups are likely obstacles for translation of LaTeX to
formats like the usual tex4ht targets.

                                    -- Bill