References: <85wsoeto1k.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
            <18385.42387.268037.81145@morse.mittelbach-online.de>
            <85skz2rzpg.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
            <18385.47367.235186.436845@morse.mittelbach-online.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-ID:  <854pbiru5z.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
Date:         Sat, 8 Mar 2008 00:28:08 +0100
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: David Kastrup <dak@GNU.ORG>
Subject: Re: A really, really bad bug.
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
In-Reply-To:  <18385.47367.235186.436845@morse.mittelbach-online.de> (Frank
              Mittelbach's message of "Fri, 7 Mar 2008 22:52:07 +0100")
Precedence: list
Status: R

Frank Mittelbach <frank.mittelbach@LATEX-PROJECT.ORG> writes:

> David Kastrup writes:
>
>  > For restoring \@newl@bel's definition afterwards.  Don't ask me why
>  > it could be needed.
>
> it could not could it? a) where? in a final OR? and b) to what purpose
> with auxfiles closed.
>
> I mean yes, that would be one of those things that would be different
> but I'm not even prepared to call that a sideeffect unless somebody
> shows me an existing application

I don't like this solution since it would still trigger save stack
overflow when there is an unclosed group at the end of the document.

I quite prefer the usual warning about an open group at the end of
document over having a save stack capacity overflow triggered.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum