Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:56:13 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBKMu7rH022840 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:56:08 +0100 Received: from comedy.dante.de (localhost. [127.0.0.1]) by comedy.dante.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id lBKMtuu7025811; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:55:56 +0100 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.171]) by comedy.dante.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id lBKMtprQ025793 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:55:54 +0100 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id c2so495424ugf.30 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:55:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.116.11 with SMTP id t11mr3979608ugm.61.1198191350453; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:55:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from macintosh.local ( [89.150.77.105]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p39sm3117066ugd.42.2007.12.20.14.55.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:55:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:55:44 +0100 To: "Frank Mittelbach" Subject: Re: Base interpreter From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Morten_H=F8gholm?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <18282.60819.421383.355246@morse.mittelbach-online.de> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <18282.60819.421383.355246@morse.mittelbach-online.de> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.25 (MacPPC) X-DANTE-Spam-Score: -2.599 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 213.139.130.197 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 80.237.159.15 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 80.237.159.15 Cc: LaTeX Team X-BeenThere: latex-team@latex-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: latex-team-bounces@latex-project.org Errors-To: latex-team-bounces@latex-project.org X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -102.599 () BAYES_00,USER_IN_WHITELIST Return-Path: latex-team-bounces@latex-project.org X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Dec 2007 22:56:13.0513 (UTC) FILETIME=[8527EB90:01C8435B] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5137 On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:32:51 +0100, Frank Mittelbach wrote: Hi Frank, > > > probably, but then eTeX is the base interpreter for LaTeX these > days so > > > there is not need to go that far back > > > > Do we have that stated somewhere except for the comment in ltnews16? > > do we have other means? ltnews 17 and 18 also refer to this, but you are > right > i don't think there has been an official announcement (other than via > ltx-l perhaps?) And the official announcement was what I meant. So far we've said we encourage people to use at least eTeX but even recently there was a thread on ctt where DA said It is good not to require e-TeX (as long as LaTeX does not). However, you could start in an e-tex arena and later make compatability layers for some parts. > but i wouldn't have any problem with simply stating this as being true > (from > now on at least). full stop (should get the latex release out though ... > :-( ) Okay and okay (yes we should). > still waiting for the baby it seems? Yup, still waiting... Zhenya is at burst level 5 and still growing... -- Morten _______________________________________________ Latex-team mailing list Latex-team@latex-project.org https://lists.dante.de/mailman/listinfo/latex-team