Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:43:50 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kB1Fhi5b030880 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:43:44 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kB1FZPG1004284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:35:25 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kAUN21SA027421; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:35:05 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.3) with spool id 1291387 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:35:05 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kB1FP5YN015455 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:25:05 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus1.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.235]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kB1FP33t032552 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:25:03 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA4497516 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:25:04 +0100 Received: from venus.open.ac.uk (venus.open.ac.uk [137.108.246.32]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kB1FObLg032370 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:24:43 +0100 Received: from sputnik.open.ac.uk ([137.108.170.76]) by venus.open.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GqAFi-0002hF-2U for LATEX-L@URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:24:38 +0000 Received: from EPPING-EVS1.open.ac.uk ([137.108.170.246]) by sputnik.open.ac.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:24:36 +0000 Lines: 14 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.10 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,GOOD_RELAY, SPF_FAIL X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.60 required=5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,GOOD_RELAY,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS X-Spam-Flag: No X-Spam-Flag: No X-Envelope-From: X-Envelope-From: X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pclt414.open.ac.uk X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Thread-Topic: Re: The Next Font Selection Scheme Thread-Index: AccVXMr+NxuNHCLVQ26GbsBa+klnIA== X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Dec 2006 15:24:37.0155 (UTC) FILETIME=[CFD7CF30:01C7155C] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de id kB1FP5YN015456 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 15:24:28 -0000 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: "J.Fine" Subject: Re: The Next Font Selection Scheme To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE Precedence: list X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: -2.599 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 213.139.130.197 Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4997 Hello In web pages, CSS is commonly used for 'font selection' and if required the endcoding can be Unicode. I'd find it helpful to know to what degree CSS and Unicode would solve font selection problems for printed pages. Excluding mathematics, of course. That has its own issues. I'm expecting a relatively short list of things that can't be done, or done only with difficulty. -- Jonathan