MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <200608180103.k7I13wm11948@f7.net>
Message-ID:  <17637.33937.266880.278043@morse.mittelbach-online.de>
Date:         Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:12:49 +0200
Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project
              <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project <LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE>
From: Frank Mittelbach <frank.mittelbach@LATEX-PROJECT.ORG>
Subject: Re: latex-tds and TL
To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE
In-Reply-To:  <200608180103.k7I13wm11948@f7.net>
Precedence: list
Status: R

Hi Karl

 > I am hoping to use Heiko's latex-tds package to update TeX Live, instead
 > of starting from the original files, because it seems that
 > (a) he did the same thing that the TL scripts do, only better;
 > (b) he's provided improved pdfs;
 > (c) it's that much less work for me :).
 > 
 > Does anyone see a problem with my going this route for TL?

the LPPL requires that you distribute a Work complete but it allows you to do
rearrangements to make it production ready (distribute a compiled Work)
provided that you do that in a way the recipient could have done it if he or
she had started from the original.

given that we assume that this is the case (and latex-tds was procduced
exactly for that purpose) I see no problem at all with this approach

frank