Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 8 Jun 2006 01:15:05 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k57NExxh021353 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 01:15:00 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k57NAmVe028571 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 8 Jun 2006 01:10:48 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k57M1BTH027817; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 01:10:41 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.3) with spool id 1288798 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 01:10:41 +0200 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k57NAeTY029166 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 01:10:40 +0200 Received: from atlas.informatik.uni-freiburg.de (atlas.informatik.uni-freiburg.de [132.230.150.3]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k57NAaLc028541 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 01:10:40 +0200 Received: from remote130-07.home.uni-freiburg.de ([132.230.130.7] helo=irwin.vpn.uni-freiburg.de) by atlas.informatik.uni-freiburg.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fo7AW-0006rg-Lk for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 01:10:33 +0200 Received: by irwin.vpn.uni-freiburg.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 6661D37244; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 01:09:27 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE References: <200606072113.k57LDuw23162@f7.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <20060607230926.GB6257@irwin.vpn.uni-freiburg.de> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 01:09:27 +0200 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Heiko Oberdiek Subject: Re: LaTeX Release 2005/12/01 To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: <200606072113.k57LDuw23162@f7.net> Precedence: list X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at proteosys.com Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jun 2006 23:15:05.0306 (UTC) FILETIME=[360413A0:01C68A88] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4971 On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:13:56PM -0500, Karl Berry wrote: > from a practical point of view I personally prefer to have all > production files for one type of task in one directory rather than > in 2 > > Indeed, I actually think it would be a great step if we could abandon > TDS with its harebrained(*) splitting by file format, and every package > simply be installed in /some/texmf/packagename-vvvv, as the author > creates it. A mess, then TeX randomly selects language.dat out of five, graphics.cfg out of fifty, ...? Yours sincerely Heiko