Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:06:49 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k5776f6Z014038 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:06:42 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5773bWJ002096 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:03:37 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k56M14lb020443; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:03:16 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.3) with spool id 1290431 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:03:16 +0200 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k5773G3N031538 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:03:16 +0200 Received: from spmler1.mail.eds.com (spmler1.mail.eds.com [194.128.225.190]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k57775vj028710 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:07:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from spmlir3.mail.eds.com (spmlir3.mail.eds.com [205.191.69.43]) by spmler1.mail.eds.com (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k57731bu005724 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 08:03:01 +0100 Received: from spmlir3.mail.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spmlir3.mail.eds.com (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k5772b7J026005 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 08:02:37 +0100 Received: from derum011.emea.corp.eds.com ([205.239.192.124]) by spmlir3.mail.eds.com (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k5772a29025974 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 08:02:37 +0100 Received: from derum207.emea.corp.eds.com ([205.239.192.44]) by derum011.emea.corp.eds.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:03:07 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: LaTeX Release 2005/12/01 thread-index: AcaJw3AzXW8YO2t4QIiJlJTsDc4jigAPEimA X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jun 2006 07:03:07.0967 (UTC) FILETIME=[6E2C54F0:01C68A00] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de id k5773G3N031539 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 09:00:34 +0200 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: "Mittelbach, Frank" Subject: AW: LaTeX Release 2005/12/01 To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE Precedence: list X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at proteosys.com Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4966 from a practical point of view I personally prefer to have all production files for one type of task in one directory rather than in 2 and not find, say babel.def in generic but babel.sty in latex, but I guess there are arguments for both cheers frank -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project [mailto:LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE] Im Auftrag von Karl Berry Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2006 01:35 An: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE Betreff: Re: LaTeX Release 2005/12/01 Regarding babel, I don't understand, why some TeX distributions put *all* files below TDS/*/generic/, from my readme.txt: There is no deep reason behind it for TL -- the ctan2tds.pl kind of steers one in the direction of choosing a single format (latex/generic/whatever) for a package. Exceptions take more code. Can't say why for teTeX and vtex. I agree that it would be better to use tex/latex/babel and tex/generic/babel as appropriate. When it is time to update TL, I hope to use your bundles and then everything will be better. Thanks, Karl