Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 8 May 2006 18:07:42 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k48G7TRg023646 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 18:07:30 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k48G6jvj028569; Mon, 8 May 2006 18:06:46 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k489tn0p022323; Mon, 8 May 2006 18:02:46 +0200 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.3) with spool id 1307354 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 8 May 2006 18:02:46 +0200 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k48G2kAR007535 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 18:02:46 +0200 Received: from atlas.informatik.uni-freiburg.de (atlas.informatik.uni-freiburg.de [132.230.150.3]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k48G64vj028417 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 18:06:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from remote129-158.home.uni-freiburg.de ([132.230.129.158] helo=irwin.vpn.uni-freiburg.de) by atlas.informatik.uni-freiburg.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Fd8Bs-0005qn-9s for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 08 May 2006 18:02:33 +0200 Received: by irwin.vpn.uni-freiburg.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id F00FC37223; Mon, 8 May 2006 17:25:33 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE References: <20060505040640.GA3369@irwin.vpn.uni-freiburg.de> <20060505.180617.71093230.wl@gnu.org> <20060506222319.GA3507@irwin.vpn.uni-freiburg.de> <20060507.072044.155818689.wl@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <20060508152533.GA12904@irwin.vpn.uni-freiburg.de> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:25:33 +0200 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Heiko Oberdiek Subject: Re: LaTeX Release 2005/12/01 To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: <20060507.072044.155818689.wl@gnu.org> Precedence: list X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at proteosys.com Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2006 16:07:46.0266 (UTC) FILETIME=[8B908BA0:01C672B9] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4950 Hello, On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 07:20:44AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > Hmm, the text in fixltx2e.pdf misses the `fl' ligature... > > > > I could see this on page 5 with xpdf 3.00 only. Then I tried AR > > 7/Linux, gs8.50: fl is present. Afterwards I went back to xpdf 3.00 > > and suddenly the fl appeared mysteriously and I cannot reproduce the > > problem. I was just too tired. > On my GNU/Linux box, xpdf 3.00, Acroread 7.0.1, and gs 8.53 fail to > display the `fl' ligature in this document. Even after conversion to > PS with pdftops (from xpdf 3.00) the ligature is missing. In > fixltx2e.ps, the `fi' ligature (which displays fine) in font > BBZAHZ+CMR10 has glyph index \014, and `fl' is glyph index \015 -- the > original cmr10.pfb has the same positions. But in the text strings > the `fl' ligature is accessed with glyph index \012, which is wrong! The error was in my tool for optimizing page streams: "fl" was written as byte with ascii code 13 ('\r', '\015'). Then Multivalent (or acroread/ghostscript, but not xpdf 3.00) have read the pdf specification. The '\r' is interpreted as end of line marker and gets normalized to '\n'. I have updated all zip files: http://www.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/~oberdiek/tmp/latex-tds/index.html Many thanks for your bug-report. Yours sincerely Heiko