Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:24:01 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k1OCNnoF024635 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:23:51 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1OCIjBa025186 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:18:45 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1O9utD5004082; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:18:44 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.3) with spool id 1352614 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:18:43 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1OCIht1009974 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:18:43 +0100 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with SMTP id k1OCIDFc025064 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:18:17 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2006 12:18:30 -0000 Received: from p54BE954E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO minerva.localnet.invalid) [84.190.149.78] by mail.gmx.net (mp037) with SMTP; 24 Feb 2006 13:18:30 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1020641 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200602231927.45843.lehman@gmx.net> <17406.56847.567915.709994@morse.mittelbach-online.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Message-ID: <200602241318.28810.lehman@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:18:28 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Philipp Lehman Subject: Re: [latex/3844] uc/lccode controls in inputenc? To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: <17406.56847.567915.709994@morse.mittelbach-online.de> Precedence: list X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at proteosys.com Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Feb 2006 12:24:01.0494 (UTC) FILETIME=[319F2760:01C6393D] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4921 Am Freitag, 24. Februar 2006 11:21 schrieb Frank Mittelbach: > again the lc/uc is not really only a property of the inputenc it is > formost a property of the output encoding due to the unfortunate > overloading with hyphenation. Well, that renders my whole argument moot. Because... > b) the problem really only exists because of using those two > primitives which are explicitly forbidden in LaTeX > c) that the model used by inputenc to manage this is actually fine ...I didn't mean to imply that there's anything wrong with inputenc. I was merely wondering if it could be made more robust with respect to primitive upper/lowercasing -- provided that there are no side effects! I suppose there's no point in pursuing this further. -- Philipp Lehman