Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:31:22 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k1G7VIoF015959 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:31:19 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1G7PKYR004249 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:25:20 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1FMZjfX001583; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:25:31 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.3) with spool id 1300596 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:25:31 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1G7PUgS005345 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:25:31 +0100 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.183]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1G7PDvY004210 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:25:16 +0100 Received: from [84.175.177.215] (helo=rigel.site) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu9) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML2xA-1F9dVz0gDm-0000iU; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:25:23 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rigel.site (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k1G7L0T5018403; Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:21:01 +0100 References: X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.54 on Emacs 22.0.50.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:2dc398bc694a1e60948148ba0a42c0da Message-ID: <20060216.082100.215544675.wl@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:21:00 +0100 Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project From: Werner LEMBERG Subject: Re: problem with encguide.pdf in beta distribution To: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE In-Reply-To: Precedence: list X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at proteosys.com Return-Path: owner-latex-l@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Feb 2006 07:31:22.0872 (UTC) FILETIME=[FC900F80:01C632CA] Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4915 > the new file is a good bit larger than the old, with several more > font tables illustrative of the various encodings. Any reason why you use pdfTeX for this? Doing the same with dvipdfmx, I get an `encguide.pdf' file with a size of 771KB, compared to your version which has whopping 1498KB. Werner