Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:29:31 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k1DITSoE028181 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:29:29 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k1DIOsvj000076; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:24:55 +0100 (MET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C630CB.6E14F780" Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.94]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1DHvrBF005535; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:22:55 +0100 Received: by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.3) with spool id 1283089 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:22:55 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k1DIMtv8006188 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:22:55 +0100 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k1DIOivj029985 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:24:44 +0100 (MET) Received: from [84.169.139.141] (helo=morse.mittelbach-online.de) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu8) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML2ov-1F8iLW1Rf7-0000bb; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:22:46 +0100 Received: by morse.mittelbach-online.de (Postfix, from userid 501) id D2B9242481; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:22:45 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <4e0e336e0602100102m5b92feceh2342050cd186444f@mail.gmail.com> References: <4e0e336e0602100102m5b92feceh2342050cd186444f@mail.gmail.com> Return-Path: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.3.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Feb 2006 18:29:31.0603 (UTC) FILETIME=[6E70FA30:01C630CB] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang at proteosys.com X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:923c546e49b26a7485eda6910e23f403 X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: 0 () Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: LaTeX (2005/12/01) Release Beta Test Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:22:45 +0100 Message-ID: A<17392.52853.840965.879254@morse.mittelbach-online.de> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: LaTeX (2005/12/01) Release Beta Test Thread-Index: AcYwy26Dd8NC8cIZTmK7oUYYU4ZTGQ== From: "Frank Mittelbach" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4906 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C630CB.6E14F780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Hendri, > some small remark. It's about the install instructions. I don't know > for other, but the miktex ones (written in 98) are out of date: > 1) run the .ins file with latex, not initex > 2) generate the format file with initexmf, not maketexfmt > 3) generating the format file can be done via miktex options, less = risk. > 4) maybe more, if i read carefully. >=20 > So, maybe these should be rewritten or alltogether removed as not = many > people will be reading them anyway, since the distributions take care > of everything nowadays. agreed, miktex would be one of the few that would still make sense. as = you have seen I started on tex-implementors and latex-l a request for = updates ... so far i only received "removals" cheers frank ------_=_NextPart_001_01C630CB.6E14F780 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: LaTeX (2005/12/01) Release Beta Test

Hi Hendri,

 > some small remark. It's about the install instructions. I = don't know
 > for other, but the miktex ones (written in 98) are out of = date:
 > 1) run the .ins file with latex, not initex
 > 2) generate the format file with initexmf, not maketexfmt
 > 3) generating the format file can be done via miktex options, = less risk.
 > 4) maybe more, if i read carefully.
 >
 > So, maybe these should be rewritten or alltogether removed as = not many
 > people will be reading them anyway, since the distributions = take care
 > of everything nowadays.

agreed, miktex would be one of the few that would still make sense. as = you
have seen I started on tex-implementors and latex-l a request for = updates
... so far i only received  "removals"

cheers
frank

------_=_NextPart_001_01C630CB.6E14F780--