Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 5 Jul 2004 09:54:43 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i657sPUO029342 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 09:54:32 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.176]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i657m1Bp008847; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 09:48:02 +0200 (MET DST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C46265.54F86380" Received: from listserv (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.176]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.7/8.12.7/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i63A8aJQ004682; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 09:45:02 +0200 Received: from LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 363244 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 09:45:01 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.7/8.12.7/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i657j1h6006619 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 09:45:01 +0200 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.173]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i657kiIY023983 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 09:46:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BhOBZ-0006Vm-00 for LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:46:45 +0200 Received: from [193.159.6.182] (helo=orion.univie.ac.at) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1BhOBX-0000eZ-00 for LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de; Mon, 05 Jul 2004 09:46:44 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by orion.univie.ac.at (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) with ESMTP id i655VY419334 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2004 07:31:35 +0200 Return-Path: X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.65 on Emacs 21.3.50.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jul 2004 07:54:45.0950 (UTC) FILETIME=[56BA85E0:01C46265] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:2dc398bc694a1e60948148ba0a42c0da X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: 0.1 () RCVD_IN_SORBS Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: accents and inputenc Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 06:31:34 +0100 Message-ID: A<20040705.073134.197330345.wl@gnu.org> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: accents and inputenc Thread-Index: AcRiZVcZ9Iy3/j3NTeGhiCYKbwQthg== From: "Werner LEMBERG" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4794 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C46265.54F86380 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [LaTeX 2e 2003/12/01] Is the following a known limitation or a bug? And if it is a limitation, where is it documented? \documentclass{article} \usepackage[latin3]{inputenc} \begin{document} \tableofcontents \section{\'^^b9} \end{document} ^^b9 is the dotless i in latin 3 -- in the TOC, the accent is formatted incorrectly. BTW, it doesn't matter whether OT1 or T1 is used. Werner ------_=_NextPart_001_01C46265.54F86380 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable accents and inputenc

[LaTeX 2e 2003/12/01]

Is the following a known limitation or a bug?  = And if it is a
limitation, where is it documented?

  \documentclass{article}

  \usepackage[latin3]{inputenc}

  \begin{document}
  \tableofcontents
  \section{\'^^b9}
  \end{document}

^^b9 is the dotless i in latin 3 -- in the TOC, the = accent is
formatted incorrectly.  BTW, it doesn't matter = whether OT1 or T1 is
used.


    Werner

------_=_NextPart_001_01C46265.54F86380--