Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 15 May 2004 12:10:39 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i4FAAZlo001327 for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 12:10:36 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.176]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4FA681K011373; Sat, 15 May 2004 12:06:08 +0200 (MET DST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C43A64.DF41F980" Received: from listserv (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.176]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.7/8.12.7/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i4E1Rh5r005625; Sat, 15 May 2004 12:04:13 +0200 Received: from LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 206727 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Sat, 15 May 2004 12:04:11 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.7/8.12.7/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i4F9sBUZ024538 for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 11:54:11 +0200 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4F9tJD6006607 for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 11:55:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BOvsz-0004N2-Rd for LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de; Sat, 15 May 2004 05:55:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <16549.4057.399610.750080@istrati.mittelbach-online.de> Lines: 20 Return-Path: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2004 10:10:39.0774 (UTC) FILETIME=[DFB813E0:01C43A64] User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: 0 () Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Why don't we do just the following: Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 10:55:16 +0100 Message-ID: A X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Why don't we do just the following: Thread-Index: AcQ6ZN/T+ixl4KavTSizv+FPrt/4sg== From: "David Kastrup" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4782 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C43A64.DF41F980 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable \def\@float{... \let\@currentlabel\barf ... } {\xdef\barf{% \csname No, read the FAQ. Really. You have to place \string\caption \space before using \string\label \space inside of a figure. \endcsname}} Something like that. Or does _anybody_ know of _any_ intentional use of a \label _inside_ of a figure, _not_ referring to the figure but to its section? I mean, this must be the candidate for the most frequently asked question on LaTeX, ever. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum ------_=_NextPart_001_01C43A64.DF41F980 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Why don't we do just the following:

\def\@float{...
  \let\@currentlabel\barf ...
}

{\xdef\barf{%
    \csname
    No, read the FAQ. Really. You have = to place \string\caption
    \space before using \string\label = \space inside of a figure.
    \endcsname}}

Something like that.  Or does _anybody_ know of = _any_ intentional use
of a \label _inside_ of a figure, _not_ referring to = the figure but
to its section?

I mean, this must be the candidate for the most = frequently asked
question on LaTeX, ever.

--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

------_=_NextPart_001_01C43A64.DF41F980--