Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 14 May 2004 20:43:16 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i4EIhClo030058 for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 20:43:13 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.176]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4EIcxD6008681; Fri, 14 May 2004 20:38:59 +0200 (MET DST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C439E3.5171FA00" Received: from listserv (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.176]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.7/8.12.7/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i4E1RhtH005625; Fri, 14 May 2004 20:37:46 +0200 Received: from LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 204984 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 14 May 2004 20:37:45 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.7/8.12.7/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i4EIbjUZ018561 for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 20:37:45 +0200 Received: from A1.atlis.com (host5.atlis.com [216.181.97.5]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4EIcqD6008650 for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 20:38:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from atlis.com (host-216-153-178-55.har.choiceone.net [216.153.178.55]) by A1.atlis.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i4EIdMY00454 for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 14:39:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wadams@atlis.com) In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20040514110156.0171f470@cits1.stanford.edu> Organization: Atlis Systems, Inc. (301) 578-4200 info@atlis.com Return-Path: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 May 2004 18:43:16.0733 (UTC) FILETIME=[51E1D2D0:01C439E3] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) X-ProteoSys-SPAM-Score: 0 () Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: TLC 2ed --- Bug contest Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 19:38:56 +0100 Message-ID: A X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: TLC 2ed --- Bug contest Thread-Index: AcQ541H7jGe99pxcQhuzYz7TZZyWVA== From: "William F. Adams" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4781 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C439E3.5171FA00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Friday, May 14, 2004, at 02:02 PM, Brooks Moses wrote: > So, how do we go about submitting the errors that we've found? deja vu. Here's what I just posted to comp.text.tex on this: The bugs are supposed to be e-mailed to Frank or one of the other authors. There's a note to that effect in the file. I'd like to note that trying to track ``printing error blue not aligned'' is rather footless. Unless caused by an actual misregistration in the .pdf source file or some mis-imaging of the plates it's going to be different from book to book, depending on how the paper just happened to be handled in-between the print runs --- a number of pages which Frank notes are mis-registered are fine in my copy, while others in copy which aren't noted as such are out-of-register. Even if the .pdf is mis-aligned between colours, some copies will come out okay---such is the analog nature of printing on a press. That said, I _really_ think the duotone screen grabs were rather poorly handled in a number of cases which made them _much_ more vulnerable to registration problems than they ought to've been, and resulting in some pretty ugly results (well at least in my copy, YMMV, well, your registration). William -- William Adams, publishing specialist voice - 717-731-6707 | Fax - 717-731-6708 www.atlis.com ------_=_NextPart_001_01C439E3.5171FA00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: TLC 2ed --- Bug contest

On Friday, May 14, 2004, at 02:02  PM, Brooks = Moses wrote:

> So, how do we go about submitting the errors that = we've found?

deja vu.

Here's what I just posted to comp.text.tex on = this:

The bugs are supposed to be e-mailed to Frank or one = of the other
authors.
There's a note to that effect in the file.

I'd like to note that trying to track ``printing error = blue not
aligned'' is
rather footless. Unless caused by an actual = misregistration in the .pdf
source
file or some mis-imaging of the plates it's going to = be different from
book to
book, depending on how the paper just happened to be = handled in-between
the
print runs --- a number of pages which Frank notes = are mis-registered
are fine
in my copy, while others in copy which aren't noted = as such are
out-of-register. Even if the .pdf is mis-aligned = between colours, some
copies
will come out okay---such is the analog nature of = printing on a press.

That said, I _really_ think the duotone screen grabs = were rather poorly
handled
in a number of cases which made them _much_ more = vulnerable to
registration
problems than they ought to've been, and resulting in = some pretty ugly
results
(well at least in my copy, YMMV, well, your = registration).

William

--
William Adams, publishing specialist
voice - 717-731-6707 | Fax - 717-731-6708
www.atlis.com

------_=_NextPart_001_01C439E3.5171FA00--