Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([213.139.130.197]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:28:19 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.9/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h6MBSHSb017967 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:28:18 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6MBJwmp002911; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:19:58 +0200 (MET DST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C35044.59BC0B80" Received: from listserv (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id h6M0UqWD015301; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:18:42 +0200 Received: from LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 0702 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:18:42 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id h6MBIfM9019404 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:18:41 +0200 Received: from localhost.localdomain (p3EE20CB6.dip.t-dialin.net [62.226.12.182]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6MBJKmp002820 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:19:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6M9vbZ8023862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:57:38 +0200 Received: (from dak@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h6M9vbMT023858; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 11:57:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200307220831.JAA01686@penguin.nag.co.uk> Lines: 13 References: <200307212243.h6LMh1h17298@abacus.maths.uq.edu.au> <16156.30324.916252.581046@zarniwoop.ms25.local> <200307220831.JAA01686@penguin.nag.co.uk> Return-Path: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jul 2003 11:28:20.0328 (UTC) FILETIME=[5A86AE80:01C35044] User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) X-Spam-Score: -33.4 () EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,QUOTE_TWICE_1,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_GNUS_UA Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: XML vs. (La)TeX markup Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 10:57:36 +0100 Message-ID: A X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Re: XML vs. (La)TeX markup Thread-Index: AcNQRFqggwrunnP4QJ6PWKfiymJCNw== From: "David Kastrup" To: Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4731 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C35044.59BC0B80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David Carlisle writes: > > I hope that this is not considered as a markup language for LaTeX3. > > No, LaTeX4. I thought that it was RovTeX, since it is almost the opposite of a vortex making the input disappear (probably some format containing something like \everyjob{\iffalse}) into nothingness. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum ------_=_NextPart_001_01C35044.59BC0B80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: XML vs. (La)TeX markup

David Carlisle <davidc@NAG.CO.UK> writes:

> > I hope that this is not considered as a = markup language for LaTeX3.
>
> No, LaTeX4.

I thought that it was RovTeX, since it is almost the = opposite of a
vortex making the input disappear (probably some = format containing
something like \everyjob{\iffalse}) into = nothingness.


--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

------_=_NextPart_001_01C35044.59BC0B80--