Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([62.225.9.49]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:35:43 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h2ILZfa9015043 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:35:42 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2ILLDle020296; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:21:13 +0100 (MET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2ED96.5400A180" Received: from listserv (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id h2HN054L027461; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:20:19 +0100 Received: from LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 9828 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:20:19 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id h2ILKJ9d003923 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:20:19 +0100 Received: from mercury.open.ac.uk (mercury.open.ac.uk [137.108.128.150]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2ILKmle020170 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:20:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from fell.open.ac.uk by mercury.open.ac.uk via SMTP Local (Mailer 3.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:19:58 +0000 Received: (from car2@localhost) by fell.open.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) id VAA17893; Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:19:29 GMT In-Reply-To: References: <3BFEACE361F5BF429DD1DA593E3A7C0922402C@XCH-NW-28.nw.nos.boeing.com> Return-Path: X-Mailer: VM 6.76 under Emacs 20.7.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Mar 2003 21:35:43.0901 (UTC) FILETIME=[548A1CD0:01C2ED96] X-Authentication-Warning: fell.open.ac.uk: car2 set sender to car2@fell.open.ac.uk using -f X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 () IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_AUTH_WARNING Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: xhead - a template pretending to be like fancyhdr Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:19:28 +0100 Message-ID: A<15991.36192.135164.382050@fell.open.ac.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Re: xhead - a template pretending to be like fancyhdr Thread-Index: AcLtllSuCtgusNUFTtyLbh1exyjNpg== From: "Chris Rowley" To: Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4592 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2ED96.5400A180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lars > > As for all the zero-sized picture thingies that has been discussed, I = have > to say that I don't quite understand what is meant. Is the idea to > construct the box to ship out from zero-sized pieces that are = positioned > relative to some fixed point of reference? Yes, > (The current approach is simply > to stack page header, body, and footer in a \vbox, is it not?) and yes. chris ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2ED96.5400A180 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: xhead - a template pretending to be like = fancyhdr

Lars

>
> As for all the zero-sized picture thingies that = has been discussed, I have
> to say that I don't quite understand what is = meant. Is the idea to
> construct the box to ship out from zero-sized = pieces that are positioned
> relative to some fixed point of = reference?

Yes,

> (The current approach is simply
> to stack page header, body, and footer in a = \vbox, is it not?)

and yes.


chris

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2ED96.5400A180--