Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([62.225.9.49]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:19:32 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h1JHJU6C006870 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:19:30 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h1JH7Ett010862; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:07:14 +0100 (MET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2D83B.1104EA00" Received: from listserv (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id h1J5Zrqn001853; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:58:43 +0100 Received: from LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 8360 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:58:43 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id h1JGwhPR008781 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:58:43 +0100 Received: from spmler1.mail.eds.com (spmler1.mail.eds.com [194.128.225.190]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h1JH73tt010766 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:07:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from spmlir3.mail.eds.com (spmlir3.mail.eds.com [205.191.69.205]) by spmler1.mail.eds.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1JH6xY08778 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:06:59 GMT Received: from spmlir3.mail.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spmlir3.mail.eds.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1JH6xM29583 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:06:59 GMT Received: from gbspm001.exemhub.exch.eds.com ([207.37.51.199]) by spmlir3.mail.eds.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1JH6xY29577 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:06:59 GMT Received: by GBSPM001 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.51) id <15199ZCZ>; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:06:55 -0000 Return-Path: X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.51) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Feb 2003 17:19:32.0598 (UTC) FILETIME=[11602960:01C2D83B] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) X-Spam-Score: 0.7 () EXCHANGE_SERVER,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: AW: [LATEX3] xor: patches for use with current classes Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:06:55 +0100 Message-ID: A<630BE70C8320D6118D240002A589ABB204A950CB@DERUM201> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: AW: [LATEX3] xor: patches for use with current classes Thread-Index: AcLYOxGEyhJYRAtmTUq/fWuBk3jXzw== From: "Mittelbach, Frank" To: Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4556 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2D83B.1104EA00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable there are change logs in every file at the bottom (generated from the rcs/cvs ceckins). given that we only talk about a small number of files = i don't think that is so bad. i'm not sure a separate log would actually = be very beneficial, but if so it should be on the level of the sub projects = eg in xor in my opinion. cheers frank The patches did not apply cleanly, so I had to do some handwork. I found that there were no ChangeLog files (which are common for projects I work with). Should I start one? If so, just in the top experimental directory? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2D83B.1104EA00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable AW: [LATEX3] xor: patches for use with current = classes

there are change logs in every file at the bottom = (generated from the
rcs/cvs ceckins). given that we only talk about a = small number of files i
don't think that is so bad. i'm not sure a separate = log would actually be
very beneficial, but if so it should be on the level = of the sub projects eg
in xor in my opinion.

cheers
frank


The patches did not apply cleanly, so I had to do some = handwork.  I
found that there were no ChangeLog files (which are = common for
projects I work with).  Should I start = one?  If so, just in the top
experimental directory?

--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2D83B.1104EA00--