Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([62.225.9.49]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Tue, 21 Jan 2003 19:09:43 +0100 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h0LI9e6C005386 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 19:09:41 +0100 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h0LHqDAa014890; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:52:13 +0100 (MET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2C178.45BC4D80" Received: from listserv (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id h0L2ppT5012859; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:44:29 +0100 Received: from LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 9367 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:44:29 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id h0LHiS5f020065 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:44:28 +0100 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id h0LHpZX3018639 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:51:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from [212.227.126.162] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18b2Yh-0003e0-00 for LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:51:35 +0100 Received: from [80.129.10.128] (helo=istrati.mittelbach-online.de) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18b2Yf-0004k1-00 for LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:51:35 +0100 Received: (from frank@localhost) by istrati.mittelbach-online.de (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id h0LHmZo23848; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:48:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200301211410.54545.tim@birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie> References: <15917.5131.149954.42674@lin2.idris.fr> <15917.9950.434672.425660@istrati.mittelbach-online.de> <200301211410.54545.tim@birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie> Return-Path: X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under Emacs 20.7.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jan 2003 18:09:43.0128 (UTC) FILETIME=[45CFD580:01C2C178] X-Authentication-Warning: istrati.mittelbach-online.de: frank set sender to frank@mittelbach-online.de using -f X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) X-Spam-Score: -0.7 () IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_AUTH_WARNING Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: LICR objects in math Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 18:48:34 +0100 Message-ID: A<15917.34802.962666.651753@istrati.mittelbach-online.de> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Re: LICR objects in math Thread-Index: AcLBeEYCwOace+8WR9O91I7Sz/bk/Q== From: "Frank Mittelbach" To: Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4462 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2C178.45BC4D80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Timothy, > But shouldn't it be reasonably difficult to use unusual symbols = within math? > There seems to me nothing wrong with requiring a special definition > of math symbols. no there isn't. i only pointed out that if there aren't any, one has to = make some or else on get's a suitable error: not possible to use in math > I didn't really understand the mention of cyrillic in this context -- > are these russian letters to be used with mathematical meanings? > As far as I know, even Russian mathematicians don't use cyrillic > in their maths (though I could be wrong about that). well Vladimir is certainly able to say so with more authority but to my knowledge people use cyrillic letters (and greek definitely). perhaps = not when the write up for a US or Irish journal though :-) > a one-line explanation of my misunderstanding would suffice. here we go :-) what is tried to allow people to use their keys on their keyboards both for text as well as for math with suitable definitions if = in math context. frank ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2C178.45BC4D80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: LICR objects in math

Timothy,

 > But shouldn't it be reasonably difficult to = use unusual symbols within math?
 > There seems to me nothing wrong with = requiring a special definition
 > of math symbols.

no there isn't. i only pointed out that if there = aren't any, one has to make
some or else on get's a suitable error: not possible = to use in math

 > I didn't really understand the mention of = cyrillic in this context --
 > are these russian letters to be used with = mathematical meanings?
 > As far as I know, even Russian = mathematicians don't use cyrillic
 > in their maths (though I could be wrong = about that).

well Vladimir is certainly able to say so with more = authority but to my
knowledge people use cyrillic letters (and greek = definitely). perhaps not when
the write up for a US or Irish journal though = :-)

 > a one-line explanation of my = misunderstanding would suffice.

here we go :-) what is tried to allow people to use = their keys on their
keyboards both for text as well as for math with = suitable definitions if in
math context.

frank

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2C178.45BC4D80--