Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([62.225.9.49]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:42:25 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g6BCfrWi004474 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:41:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C228D8.686FCE80" Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6BCQmT8015019; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:26:48 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from listserv (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id g6ANGRB7031196; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:27:58 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 4658 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:27:58 +0200 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (relay2.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.210.211]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id g6BCRwrU003725 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:27:58 +0200 Received: from smtp.wanadoo.es ([62.37.236.142]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g6BCQeT8014996 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:26:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from [62.37.82.106] (62-37-82-106.dialup.uni2.es [62.37.82.106]) by smtp.wanadoo.es (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6BCPi030600 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:25:44 +0200 In-Reply-To: Return-Path: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jul 2002 12:42:25.0666 (UTC) FILETIME=[68D56E20:01C228D8] User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2106 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.6 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: LPPL under review at savannah.gnu.org Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 13:27:23 +0100 Message-ID: A X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Re: LPPL under review at savannah.gnu.org Thread-Index: AcIo2GjvQu6iWxNuSP2Kwj4vwY7kaw== From: "Javier Bezos" To: Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4280 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C228D8.686FCE80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lars, >> That makes sense, but afaik the LPPL doesn't say that. However, >> I think a clear distinction should be made between the LPPL >> and the CTAN policy. CTAN won't accept a class/package whose >> name clashes with the name of an existing class/package, except >> if the author cannot be reached, etc. > > Is that actual CTAN policy, or you just thinking loud? Just thinking aloud (not only here, but in the rest of the post, too). Javier ------_=_NextPart_001_01C228D8.686FCE80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: LPPL under review at savannah.gnu.org

Lars,

>> That makes sense, but afaik the LPPL doesn't = say that. However,
>> I think a clear distinction should be made = between the LPPL
>> and the CTAN policy. CTAN won't accept a = class/package whose
>> name clashes with the name of an existing = class/package, except
>> if the author cannot be reached, etc.
>
> Is that actual CTAN policy, or you just thinking = loud?

Just thinking aloud (not only here, but in the = rest
of the post, too).

Javier

------_=_NextPart_001_01C228D8.686FCE80--