Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([62.225.9.49]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:59:20 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g688wiWi024840 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:58:45 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g688feWK011860; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:41:40 +0200 (MET DST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2265D.BF1DA400" Received: from listserv (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id g681sv4H007248; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:43:03 +0200 Received: from LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 4432 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:43:03 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id g688h3xD009208 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:43:03 +0200 Received: from spmler3.mail.eds.com (spmler3.mail.eds.com [194.128.225.186]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g688fcWK011831 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:41:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from spmlir1.mail.eds.com (spmlir1-2.mail.eds.com [205.191.69.199]) by spmler3.mail.eds.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g688fUI29360 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:41:31 GMT Received: from nnse.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spmlir1.mail.eds.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g688fUU19850 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 08:41:30 GMT Received: from gbspm001.exemhub.exch.eds.com ([207.37.51.199]) by nnse.eds.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g688fUG21367 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:41:30 +0100 (BST) Received: by GBSPM001 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3KWB5ACF>; Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:41:28 +0100 Return-Path: X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jul 2002 08:59:20.0612 (UTC) FILETIME=[BF7B0640:01C2265D] x-mime-autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de id g688h3xD009209 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.6 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: AW: LPPL under review at savannah.gnu.org Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:41:16 +0100 Message-ID: A<630BE70C8320D6118D240002A589ABB201CB7C00@DERUM201> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: AW: LPPL under review at savannah.gnu.org Thread-Index: AcImXb+zR1bTjohMSGeT1kldRX69Rg== From: "Mittelbach, Frank" To: Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4260 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2265D.BF1DA400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable if savannah only accepts GPL then that doesn't surprise me. what i have seen two days ago as arguments however was only the one = about not liking to rename files (which you could have pointed out is allowed = as part of the OSI as well as the debian guidelines) have there been any new arguments? frank -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: Martin Schroeder [mailto:martin@ONEIROS.DE] Gesendet: Montag, 8. Juli 2002 10:10 An: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de Betreff: Re: LPPL under review at savannah.gnu.org On 2002-07-05 13:28:22 +0200, Martin Schr=F6der wrote: > I'm trying to get the LPPL approved for at least one project > ("case by case") at savannah.gnu.org . If anybody want's to look And was quickly shot down. :-( Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de ------_=_NextPart_001_01C2265D.BF1DA400 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable AW: LPPL under review at savannah.gnu.org

if savannah only accepts GPL then that doesn't = surprise me.

what i have seen two days ago as arguments however was = only the one about
not liking to rename files (which you could have = pointed out is allowed as
part of the OSI as well as the debian = guidelines)

have there been any new arguments?

frank

-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Martin Schroeder [mailto:martin@ONEIROS.DE]
Gesendet: Montag, 8. Juli 2002 10:10
An: LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de
Betreff: Re: LPPL under review at = savannah.gnu.org


On 2002-07-05 13:28:22 +0200, Martin Schr=F6der = wrote:
> I'm trying to get the LPPL approved for at least = one project
> ("case by case") at savannah.gnu.org . = If anybody want's to look

And was quickly shot down. :-(

Best regards
        = Martin
--
          &nbs= p;         http://www.tm.oneiros.de

------_=_NextPart_001_01C2265D.BF1DA400--