Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([62.225.9.49]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:12:28 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g62FBhxH001962 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 17:11:45 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g62EvHT8000975; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:57:17 +0200 (MET DST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C221DA.E0ECD600" Received: from listserv (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id g625W1Ch029395; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:58:11 +0200 Received: from LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 3090 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:58:11 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id g62EwAxD001024 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:58:10 +0200 Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (root@gwyn.kn-bremen.de [212.63.36.242]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g62EuMWK003038 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 16:56:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from gwyn.kn-bremen.de (uucp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) with ESMTP id g62D2H3B026404 for ; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 15:02:17 +0200 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by gwyn.kn-bremen.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -5) with UUCP id g62D2HKu026402 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 15:02:17 +0200 Received: (from ms@localhost) by lucien.oneiros.kn-bremen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA05319 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 2 Jul 2002 15:01:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <15641.26499.585788.284057@istrati.mittelbach-online.de>; from frank.mittelbach@LATEX-PROJECT.ORG on Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 09:04:35AM +0200 References: <15639.26375.782098.164234@istrati.mittelbach-online.de> <3D17F428.20702@toshiba.co.jp> <15640.43741.596149.994860@istrati.mittelbach-online.de> <20020625.233428.00785159.wl@gnu.org> <20020626000848.A10829@lucien.kn-bremen.de> <15641.26499.585788.284057@istrati.mittelbach-online.de> Return-Path: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jul 2002 15:12:28.0471 (UTC) FILETIME=[E134B470:01C221DA] mail-followup-to: LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.6 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: Suggested changes to LPPL Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 14:01:44 +0100 Message-ID: A<20020702150144.A5265@lucien.kn-bremen.de> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Re: Suggested changes to LPPL Thread-Index: AcIh2uFolUBaLNHZSfqGmtDzSiKq0w== From: "Martin Schroeder" To: Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4235 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C221DA.E0ECD600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2002-06-26 09:04:35 +0200, Frank Mittelbach wrote: > as David pointed out the LPPL came into existance largely due to an = anourmous > amount of mail exchange (and personal discussions) with Richard; so = his input > is actually already there (and he was satisfied with it). Fact is that the LPPL is no approved license for Sourceforge, Savannah (which want's GPL-compatible licenses, cf. https://savannah.gnu.org/faq/?group_id=3D11&question=3DWhat_is_the_regist= ration_process.txt) nor berlios (which want's osi approved licenses). I know your rationale for the license, but the fact that it's not approved by theses repositories makes life at least more complicated than needed. Best regards Martin -- http://www.tm.oneiros.de ------_=_NextPart_001_01C221DA.E0ECD600 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: Suggested changes to LPPL

On 2002-06-26 09:04:35 +0200, Frank Mittelbach = wrote:
> as David pointed out the LPPL came into = existance largely due to an anourmous
> amount of mail exchange (and personal = discussions) with Richard; so his input
> is actually already there (and he was satisfied = with it).

Fact is that the LPPL is no approved license for = Sourceforge,
Savannah (which want's GPL-compatible licenses, = cf.
https://savannah.gnu.org/faq/?group_id=3D11&q= uestion=3DWhat_is_the_registration_process.txt)
nor berlios (which want's osi approved = licenses).

I know your rationale for the license, but the fact = that it's not
approved by theses repositories makes life at least = more
complicated than needed.

Best regards
    Martin
--
          &nbs= p;         http://www.tm.oneiros.de

------_=_NextPart_001_01C221DA.E0ECD600--