Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([62.225.9.49]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Wed, 26 Jun 2002 09:20:44 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5Q7KHxC005128 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 09:20:18 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g5Q74nWK001670; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 09:04:49 +0200 (MET DST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C21CE1.FBF2AE00" Received: from listserv (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id g5PM02eA012637; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 09:06:43 +0200 Received: from LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 2427 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 09:06:43 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id g5Q76haE015140 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 09:06:43 +0200 Received: from moutng1.kundenserver.de (moutng1.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.171]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g5Q74kWK001648 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 09:04:46 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from [212.227.126.162] (helo=mrelayng1.schlund.de) by moutng1.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2) id 17N6r7-0002kK-00 for LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 09:04:45 +0200 Received: from [80.129.5.34] (helo=istrati.mittelbach-online.de) by mrelayng1.schlund.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 17N6r6-0000NF-00 for LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 09:04:45 +0200 Received: (from frank@localhost) by istrati.mittelbach-online.de (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id g5Q74Zw24678; Wed, 26 Jun 2002 09:04:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20020626000848.A10829@lucien.kn-bremen.de> References: <15639.26375.782098.164234@istrati.mittelbach-online.de> <3D17F428.20702@toshiba.co.jp> <15640.43741.596149.994860@istrati.mittelbach-online.de> <20020625.233428.00785159.wl@gnu.org> <20020626000848.A10829@lucien.kn-bremen.de> Return-Path: X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under Emacs 20.7.1 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jun 2002 07:20:44.0741 (UTC) FILETIME=[FC63BF50:01C21CE1] X-Authentication-Warning: istrati.mittelbach-online.de: frank set sender to frank@mittelbach-online.de using -f X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.6 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: Suggested changes to LPPL Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 08:04:35 +0100 Message-ID: A<15641.26499.585788.284057@istrati.mittelbach-online.de> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Re: Suggested changes to LPPL Thread-Index: AcIc4fx/ukPwgoZuSP6XqwdVNmv+Ww== From: "Frank Mittelbach" To: Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4215 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C21CE1.FBF2AE00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Martin & Werner > On 2002-06-25 23:34:28 +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > I suggest that you contact Richard Stallman. > > Or at least fsfeurope.org and the osi. as David pointed out the LPPL came into existance largely due to an = anourmous amount of mail exchange (and personal discussions) with Richard; so his = input is actually already there (and he was satisfied with it). my suggested change is in fact prompted by a suggestion from Richard how = to get rid that problematic part. Thus i don't expect new arguments coming from = that direction. frank ------_=_NextPart_001_01C21CE1.FBF2AE00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: Suggested changes to LPPL

Martin & Werner

 > On 2002-06-25 23:34:28 +0200, Werner = LEMBERG wrote:
 > > I suggest that you contact Richard = Stallman.
 >
 > Or at least fsfeurope.org and the = osi.

as David pointed out the LPPL came into existance = largely due to an anourmous
amount of mail exchange (and personal discussions) = with Richard; so his input
is actually already there (and he was satisfied with = it).

my suggested change is in fact prompted by a = suggestion from Richard how to get
rid that problematic part. Thus i don't expect new = arguments coming from that
direction.

frank

------_=_NextPart_001_01C21CE1.FBF2AE00--