Received: from mail.proteosys.com ([62.225.9.49]) by nummer-3.proteosys with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.4905); Tue, 25 Jun 2002 07:04:33 +0200 Received: by mail.proteosys.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g5P545xC032580 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 07:04:06 +0200 Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g5P4q5tx011820; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 06:52:05 +0200 (MET DST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C21C05.CB3D4680" Received: from listserv (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id g5OM03dM004555; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 06:52:15 +0200 Received: from LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 2447 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 06:52:15 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.2/8.12.2/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id g5P4gFaE006246 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 06:42:15 +0200 Received: from inet-tsb.toshiba.co.jp (inet-tsb.toshiba.co.jp [202.33.96.40]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g5P4eDtx010356 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 06:40:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from tsb-wall.toshiba.co.jp ([133.199.160.134]) by inet-tsb.toshiba.co.jp (3.7W:TOSHIBA-ISC-2000030918) with ESMTP id NAA22949 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:40:11 +0900 (JST) Received: (from root@localhost) by tsb-wall.toshiba.co.jp (8.11.5/3.7W) id g5P4eAI08075 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:40:10 +0900 (JST) Received: from tis2 [133.199.160.66] by tsb-wall.toshiba.co.jp with SMTP id PAA08068 ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:40:10 +0900 Received: from mx2.toshiba.co.jp by tis2.tis.toshiba.co.jp (8.8.4+2.7Wbeta4/3.3W9-95082317) id NAA09376; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:40:10 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailhost.eel.rdc.toshiba.co.jp by toshiba.co.jp (8.7.1+2.6Wbeta4/3.3W9-TOSHIBA-GLOBAL SERVER) id NAA28112; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:40:08 +0900 (JST) Received: from toshiba.co.jp (som-dhcp-203 [133.196.80.203]) by mailhost.eel.rdc.toshiba.co.jp (8.9.3/1.10) with ESMTP id NAA95807 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 13:40:08 +0900 (JST) References: <3.0.6.32.20020621144417.007b3100@mail.uark.edu> <15639.26375.782098.164234@istrati.mittelbach-online.de> Return-Path: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jun 2002 05:04:33.0921 (UTC) FILETIME=[CBC9CF10:01C21C05] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; ja-JP; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020530 X-Accept-Language: ja, en-us, en X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.6 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: Page geometry in LaTeX Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 05:40:08 +0100 Message-ID: A<3D17F428.20702@toshiba.co.jp> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Re: Page geometry in LaTeX Thread-Index: AcIcBcv9BAIwuuIeSg27wwNPGjZo1w== From: "Hideo Umeki" To: Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4206 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C21C05.CB3D4680 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Frank Mittelbach wrote: > I spend the last month(s) in collaboration with Hideo to work on a new release > of geometry, and i agree, it might indeed be a good idea as a first step to > move the (new) geometry distribution to required. I also agree to that idea. Eventually I almost finished the beta test for the new geometry package. So I'm thinking about updating the geometry package on CTAN this weekend. > ps Hideo/Heiko: if you are not on latex-l you may not be able to reply > sucessfully to this message without subscribing I've just subscribed. Sincerely, Hideo ------_=_NextPart_001_01C21C05.CB3D4680 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Re: Page geometry in LaTeX

Frank Mittelbach wrote:
> I spend the last month(s) in collaboration with Hideo to work on a new release
> of geometry, and i agree, it might indeed be a good idea as a first step to
> move the (new) geometry distribution to required.

I also agree to that idea.
Eventually I almost finished the beta test for the new geometry package.
So I'm thinking about updating the geometry package on CTAN this weekend.

> ps Hideo/Heiko: if you are not on latex-l you may not be able to reply
> sucessfully to this message without subscribing

I've just subscribed.

Sincerely,
Hideo

------_=_NextPart_001_01C21C05.CB3D4680--