Received: from webgate.proteosys.de (mail.proteosys-ag.com [62.225.9.49]) by lucy.proteosys (8.11.0/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id f7VF51905733 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:05:01 +0200 Received: by webgate.proteosys.de (8.11.4/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7VF4OT22557 . for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:04:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C1322E.4E804C80" Received: from mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailserver1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.30]) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f7VF4NG03831 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:04:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.56]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA04444 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:04:23 +0200 (MEST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f7VF4MG03823 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:04:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f7VF3Gb06983; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:03:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from listserv (listserv.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.27]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id f7VF2Ko10395; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:02:20 +0200 Received: from LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8d) with spool id 1050 for LATEX-L@LISTSERV.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:01:27 +0200 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by listserv.uni-heidelberg.de (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id f7VF1Ro10389 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:01:27 +0200 Received: from wisbech.cl.cam.ac.uk (mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk [128.232.0.15]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f7VF2Db06758 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:02:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pallas.cl.cam.ac.uk ([128.232.8.88] helo=cl.cam.ac.uk ident=rf) by wisbech.cl.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.092 #1) id 15cpoD-0003AP-00 for LATEX-L@listserv.uni-heidelberg.de; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:02:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:52:44 +0200." <15247.27772.447636.809305@istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de> Return-Path: Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: LaTeX3 and Omega Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:02:13 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Robin Fairbairns" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4156 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1322E.4E804C80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Javier, > > > I dream about that. Multilingual support for a dual TeX/Omega > > LaTeX could be a mess to users and developpers. But I'm > > just dreaming, since the LaTeX team has said in this list that > > LaTeX3 will be a dual system. > > the "LaTeX team" hasn't said anything like this on this list. If you = are > refering to Robin's comments then please take them as Robin's = comments, > period. If it is not possible for project team members to voice their = opinion > on something without it being viewed as CARVED IN CONCRETE AS PROJECT > DIRECTIVES then there is no chance whatesoever to have any discussion = on > anything at all. i thought, after i had posted the message, that i should have asserted that i was speaking personally. but it seemed to me that, since i had used first-person verbs when describing my thoughts, it was clear it was _me_ speaking and not the project. how careful one has to be! robin ------_=_NextPart_001_01C1322E.4E804C80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: LaTeX3 and Omega

> Javier,
>
>  > I dream about that. Multilingual = support for a dual TeX/Omega
>  > LaTeX could be a mess to users and = developpers. But I'm
>  > just dreaming, since the LaTeX team = has said in this list that
>  > LaTeX3 will be a dual system.
>
> the "LaTeX team" hasn't said anything = like this on this list. If you are
> refering to Robin's comments then please take = them as Robin's comments,
> period.  If it is not possible for project = team members to voice their opinion
> on something without it being viewed as CARVED = IN CONCRETE AS PROJECT
> DIRECTIVES then there is no chance whatesoever = to have any discussion on
> anything at all.

i thought, after i had posted the message, that i = should have asserted
that i was speaking personally.  but it seemed = to me that, since i had
used first-person verbs when describing my thoughts, = it was clear it
was _me_ speaking and not the project.

how careful one has to be!

robin

------_=_NextPart_001_01C1322E.4E804C80--