Received: from webgate.proteosys.de (mail.proteosys-ag.com [62.225.9.49]) by lucy.proteosys (8.11.0/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id f25MrVW12567 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:53:31 +0100 Received: by webgate.proteosys.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f25MrVs19828 . for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:53:31 +0100 Received: from mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailserver1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.30]) by mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f25MrRJ16501 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:53:27 +0100 (MET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C0A5C7.196CA780" Received: from mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.56]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA25758 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:53:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f25MrPV13501 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:53:25 +0100 (MET) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <9.E6D72054@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:53:12 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 498579 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:53:22 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (mail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.234]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA13308 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:53:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA27674 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:53:21 +0100 Received: from venus.open.ac.uk (venus.open.ac.uk [137.108.143.2]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f25MrMh07546 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:53:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from fell.open.ac.uk by venus.open.ac.uk via SMTP Local (Mailer 3.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 22:53:19 +0000 Received: (from car2@localhost) by fell.open.ac.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) id WAA07906; Mon, 5 Mar 2001 22:53:19 GMT In-Reply-To: <15011.53018.104354.912694@hoelderlin.localdomain> References: <200102131350.IAA05912@hilbert.math.albany.edu> <14985.38673.90940.10236@istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de> <14985.49901.719230.884652@spqr2.oucs.ox.ac.uk> <14996.10446.221542.469341@istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de> <15011.53018.104354.912694@hoelderlin.localdomain> Return-Path: X-Mailer: VM 6.76 under Emacs 20.7.1 X-Authentication-Warning: fell.open.ac.uk: car2 set sender to car2@fell.open.ac.uk using -f Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: LaTeX's internal char prepresentation (UTF8 or Unicode?) Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:53:19 +0100 Message-ID: <15012.6367.66852.423730@fell.open.ac.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Chris Rowley" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: "Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L" Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0A5C7.196CA780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marcel > Frank, I am trying right now (after being away for a while) to update > the multilingual encodings summary. I think you have hinted at > imperfections of Unicode more than once. Do you have any concrete > points that are interesting/relevant to this discussion, which I could > add to the document? I am sending you privately a paper that Frank and I wrote about this a few years ago. I doubt if this covers everything Frank and/or I would say now about it but it is a start, and much of it is relevant to multi-lingual documants in gneral. chris ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0A5C7.196CA780 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: LaTeX's internal char prepresentation (UTF8 or = Unicode?)

Marcel

> Frank, I am trying right now (after being away = for a while) to update
> the multilingual encodings summary.  I = think you have hinted at
> imperfections of Unicode more than once.  = Do you have any concrete
> points that are interesting/relevant to this = discussion, which I could
> add to the document?

I am sending you privately a paper that Frank and I = wrote about this a
few years ago.  I doubt if this covers = everything Frank and/or I would
say now about it but it is a start, and much of it is = relevant to
multi-lingual documants in gneral.


chris

------_=_NextPart_001_01C0A5C7.196CA780--