Received: from webgate.proteosys.de (mail.proteosys-ag.com [62.225.9.49]) by lucy.proteosys (8.11.0/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id f1RA9TW05704 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:09:29 +0100 Received: by webgate.proteosys.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1RA9Ts26481 . for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:09:29 +0100 Received: from mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailserver1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.30]) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f1RA9PH20757 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:09:25 +0100 (MET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C0A0A5.5EFC1280" Received: from mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.57]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA19319 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:09:24 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f1RA9OQ01273 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:09:24 +0100 (MET) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <13.2DCBEC04@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:09:12 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 494153 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:09:21 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (mail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.234]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA12394 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:09:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA55402 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:09:19 +0100 Received: from server-23.tower-4.starlabs.net (mail.london-1.starlabs.net [212.125.75.12]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with SMTP id f1RA9Jh22339 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:09:19 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 12463 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2001 10:03:34 -0000 Received: from nagmx1e.nag.co.uk (HELO nag.co.uk) (62.232.54.130) by server-23.tower-4.starlabs.net with SMTP; 27 Feb 2001 10:03:34 -0000 Received: from penguin.nag.co.uk (IDENT:root@penguin.nag.co.uk [192.156.217.14]) by nag.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA17115 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:09:06 GMT Received: by penguin.nag.co.uk (8.9.3) id KAA00521; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 10:07:07 GMT In-Reply-To: (message from Hans Aberg on Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:34:45 +0100) References: (message from Hans Aberg on Mon, 26 Feb 2001 16:37:33 +0100) (message from Hans Aberg on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 21:04:40 +0100) (message from Barbara Beeton on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:16:42 -0500) Return-Path: X-VirusChecked: Checked Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: LaTeX's internal char prepresentation (UTF8 or Unicode?) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:07:07 +0100 Message-ID: <200102271007.KAA00521@penguin.nag.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "David Carlisle" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: "Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L" Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4022 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0A0A5.5EFC1280 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Yes I did (apart from the fact that I could find no convenient archive = to > pick them down, making the process excruciatingly slow on my = computer). There's a zip file of the spec linked from the front page. You may also prefer the pdf charts available from the unicode.org site. > I think these should be But that isn't the way ISO works. It works by international ballot and negotiation over a period of several years... (Just for this one submission for math characters) > But perhaps Unicode has already made up its mind, so there is nothing = to do > about it... Not quite, but almost. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet = delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information = visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0A0A5.5EFC1280 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: LaTeX's internal char prepresentation (UTF8 or = Unicode?)

> Yes I did (apart from the fact that I could find = no convenient archive to
> pick them down, making the process = excruciatingly slow on my computer).

There's a zip file of the spec linked from the front = page.

You may also prefer the pdf charts available from the = unicode.org site.

> I think these should be
But that isn't the way ISO works. It works by = international ballot and
negotiation over a period of several years... (Just = for this one
submission for math characters)

> But perhaps Unicode has already made up its mind, = so there is nothing to do
> about it...

Not quite, but almost.

David


________________________________________________________________= _____
This message has been checked for all known viruses = by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For = further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.as= p

------_=_NextPart_001_01C0A0A5.5EFC1280--