Received: from webgate.proteosys.de (mail.proteosys-ag.com [62.225.9.49]) by lucy.proteosys (8.11.0/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id f1Q9vnW01048 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:57:49 +0100 Received: by webgate.proteosys.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1Q9e4s22431 . for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:40:04 +0100 Received: from mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailserver1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.30]) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f1Q9e3H01979 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:40:03 +0100 (MET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C09FDA.9356CC80" Received: from mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.57]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA12088 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:40:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f1Q9dtQ13794 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:39:55 +0100 (MET) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <7.F052829A@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:25:43 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 493323 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:25:52 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (mail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.234]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA25034 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:25:51 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA45602 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:25:51 +0100 Received: from server-23.tower-4.starlabs.net (mail.london-1.starlabs.net [212.125.75.12]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with SMTP id f1Q9Pkh16800 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:25:50 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 19367 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2001 09:20:17 -0000 Received: from nagmx1e.nag.co.uk (HELO nag.co.uk) (62.232.54.130) by server-23.tower-4.starlabs.net with SMTP; 26 Feb 2001 09:20:17 -0000 Received: from penguin.nag.co.uk (IDENT:root@penguin.nag.co.uk [192.156.217.14]) by nag.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA05923 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:25:36 GMT Received: by penguin.nag.co.uk (8.9.3) id JAA23064; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 09:23:53 GMT In-Reply-To: (message from Hans Aberg on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 21:04:40 +0100) References: (message from Barbara Beeton on Fri, 23 Feb 2001 11:16:42 -0500) Return-Path: X-VirusChecked: Checked Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: LaTeX's internal char prepresentation (UTF8 or Unicode?) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 10:23:53 +0100 Message-ID: <200102260923.JAA23064@penguin.nag.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "David Carlisle" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: "Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L" Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 4018 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C09FDA.9356CC80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > In my opinion, there are two entries missing: It's a list given to us by Unicode/ISO they were working under a (self imposed, I believe) constraint that everything had to fit within a single 1024 block. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet = delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further information = visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp ------_=_NextPart_001_01C09FDA.9356CC80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: LaTeX's internal char prepresentation (UTF8 or = Unicode?)

> In my opinion, there are two entries = missing:

It's a list given to us by Unicode/ISO they were = working under a (self
imposed, I believe) constraint that everything had to = fit within a
single 1024 block.

David

________________________________________________________________= _____
This message has been checked for all known viruses = by Star Internet delivered
through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For = further information visit
http://www.star.net.uk/stats.as= p

------_=_NextPart_001_01C09FDA.9356CC80--