Received: from webgate.proteosys.de (mail.proteosys-ag.com [62.225.9.49]) by lucy.proteosys (8.11.0/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id f1EKkDH04523 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:46:13 +0100 Received: by webgate.proteosys.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1EKkDd07804 . for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:46:13 +0100 Received: from mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailserver1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.30]) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f1EKkCM03289 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:46:12 +0100 (MET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C096C7.2AF91880" Received: from mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.56]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA24332 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:46:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f1EKkBM03283 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:46:11 +0100 (MET) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <2.FC4B4D08@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:46:01 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 489125 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:46:05 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (mail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.234]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA00177 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:46:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA52676 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:46:04 +0100 Received: from knatte.tninet.se (knatte.tninet.se [195.100.94.10]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with SMTP id f1EKk5x08512 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:46:05 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 10539 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2001 21:46:03 +0100 Received: from delenn.tninet.se (HELO algonet.se) (195.100.94.104) by knatte.tninet.se with SMTP; 14 Feb 2001 21:46:03 +0100 Received: from [195.100.226.180] (du129-226.ppp.su-anst.tninet.se [195.100.226.129]) by delenn.tninet.se (BLUETAIL Mail Robustifier 2.2.1) with ESMTP id 525477.183561.982delenn-s0 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:46:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2.07b5.RCBL.G8RKLA@cherepan.mccme.ru> References: Your message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:44:31 +0100." Return-Path: X-Sender: haberg@pop.matematik.su.se Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: Why markup? Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 21:45:33 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Hans Aberg" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: "Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L" Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3928 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C096C7.2AF91880 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 23:22 +0300 2001/02/14, Alexander Cherepanov wrote: >The question is "can markup be avoided completely?" You are the one posing that question... >As for a math environment, how will you parse (without math markup) the = last >sentence in the following example: ... > Editor writes: The gap in the last formula [i.e. \mskip20mu] should = be > made like in the first one and the $gap$ should be made like in the > second one. The answer is as always: If you can parse it without markup, then it is possible to parse it, right? If you, or other humans, cannot parse it = that way without markup, then don't expect the computer do it for you. :-) Hans Aberg ------_=_NextPart_001_01C096C7.2AF91880 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: Why markup?

At 23:22 +0300 2001/02/14, Alexander Cherepanov = wrote:
>The question is "can markup be avoided = completely?"

You are the one posing that question...

>As for a math environment, how will you parse = (without math markup) the last
>sentence in the following example:
...
>    Editor writes: The gap in the = last formula [i.e. \mskip20mu] should be
>    made like in the first one and = the $gap$ should be made like in the
>    second one.

The answer is as always: If you can parse it without = markup, then it is
possible to parse it, right? If you, or other humans, = cannot parse it that
way without markup, then don't expect the computer do = it for you. :-)

  Hans Aberg

------_=_NextPart_001_01C096C7.2AF91880--