Received: from webgate.proteosys.de (mail.proteosys-ag.com [62.225.9.49]) by lucy.proteosys (8.11.0/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id f1CEDi919589 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:13:44 +0100 Received: by webgate.proteosys.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1CEDhd29416 . for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:13:43 +0100 Received: from mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailserver1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.30]) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f1CEDdM10531 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:13:39 +0100 (MET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C094FE.01D95C00" Received: from mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.56]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA10683 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:13:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f1CEDaM10525 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:13:36 +0100 (MET) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <1.D1F4DC0A@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:13:30 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 488404 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:13:33 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (mail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.234]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA08342 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:13:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA14414 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:13:31 +0100 Received: from angel.algonet.se (angel.algonet.se [194.213.74.112]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with SMTP id f1CEDQu17183 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:13:31 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 21164 invoked from network); 12 Feb 2001 15:13:21 +0100 Received: from delenn.tninet.se (HELO algonet.se) (195.100.94.104) by angel.algonet.se with SMTP; 12 Feb 2001 15:13:21 +0100 Received: from [195.100.226.129] (du129-226.ppp.su-anst.tninet.se [195.100.226.129]) by delenn.tninet.se (BLUETAIL Mail Robustifier 2.2.1) with ESMTP id 544828.987192.981delenn-s1 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:13:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200102121025.KAA15302@nag.co.uk> References: <14982.59968.683159.480912@istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de> (message from Frank Mittelbach on Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:38:40 +0100) <14982.45082.150652.74719@istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de> <14982.59968.683159.480912@istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de> Return-Path: X-Sender: haberg@pop.matematik.su.se Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: LaTeX's internal char prepresentation (UTF8 or Unicode?) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:51:18 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Hans Aberg" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: "Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L" Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3846 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C094FE.01D95C00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 10:25 +0000 2001/02/12, David Carlisle wrote: >It may be worth noting that unicode 3.1 and 3.2 will (assuming the >current plans go through) have a lot more (~1500 more, If I recall >correctly) math characters than unicode 3.0. Actually one of the main >things missing (currently) are long arrows. We (MathML working group) >are in touch with the Unicode folks to see if there's any chance of >those being added as well, although time is getting short for further >additions to 3.1 and 3.2. Why do you want to add them? -- The semantic meaning of long arrows is exactly the same as the short ones (or do you know of a counter = example). -- So a long arrow is a different rendering of a short one. Hans Aberg ------_=_NextPart_001_01C094FE.01D95C00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: LaTeX's internal char prepresentation (UTF8 or = Unicode?)

At 10:25 +0000 2001/02/12, David Carlisle = wrote:
>It may be worth noting that unicode 3.1 and 3.2 = will (assuming the
>current plans go through) have a lot more (~1500 = more, If I recall
>correctly) math characters than unicode 3.0. = Actually one of the main
>things missing (currently) are long arrows. We = (MathML working group)
>are in touch with the Unicode folks to see if = there's any chance of
>those being added as well, although time is = getting short for further
>additions to 3.1 and 3.2.

Why do you want to add them? -- The semantic meaning = of long arrows is
exactly the same as the short ones (or do you know of = a counter example).
-- So a long arrow is a different rendering of a = short one.

  Hans Aberg

------_=_NextPart_001_01C094FE.01D95C00--