Received: from webgate.proteosys.de (mail.proteosys-ag.com [62.225.9.49]) by lucy.proteosys (8.11.0/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id f1AGs1H08521 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:54:01 +0100 Received: by webgate.proteosys.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1AGs0d22152 . for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:54:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C09382.11339A80" Received: from mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailserver1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.30]) by mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f1AGs0704158 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:54:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.56]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA21648 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:53:59 +0100 (MET) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f1AGrxM21591 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:53:59 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <7.E52BCB2B@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:53:53 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 487644 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:53:56 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (mail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.234]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA10317 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:53:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA21614 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:53:55 +0100 Received: from matups.math.u-psud.fr (mathups.math.u-psud.fr [129.175.52.4]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f1AGruu15257 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:53:56 +0100 (MET) Received: from stats.math.u-psud.fr (beryl.math.u-psud.fr [129.175.54.194]) by matups.math.u-psud.fr (8.11.0/jtpda-5.3.3) with ESMTP id f1AGrjG19676 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:53:45 +0100 (MET) Received: (from sieben@localhost) by stats.math.u-psud.fr (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id RAA08790; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:55:37 GMT Return-Path: Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: MLTeX vs AE virtual fonts Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:55:37 +0100 Message-ID: <200102101755.RAA08790@stats.math.u-psud.fr> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Laurent Siebenmann" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: "Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L" Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3793 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C09382.11339A80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable me: >> There is no electronic document format that is overall better >> [than DVI] re compactness, usability, and long term stability. you: > re usability, you're kidding, aren't you? Not really. See http://topo.math.u-psud.fr/~lcs/articles/AcroDVI. >...mouth, then stomach, where do you think DVI emerge from? Ah, very clever fellow, from you? Laurent S ------_=_NextPart_001_01C09382.11339A80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: MLTeX vs AE virtual fonts

me:
>> There is no electronic document format that = is overall better
>> [than DVI] re compactness, usability, and = long term stability.

you:
 > re usability, you're kidding, aren't = you?

Not really. See http://topo.mat= h.u-psud.fr/~lcs/articles/AcroDVI.

 >...mouth, then stomach, where do you think = DVI emerge from?

Ah, very clever fellow, from you?

Laurent S

------_=_NextPart_001_01C09382.11339A80--