Received: from webgate.proteosys.de (mail.proteosys-ag.com [62.225.9.49]) by lucy.proteosys (8.11.0/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id f18BcYH30137 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:38:34 +0100 Received: by webgate.proteosys.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f18BcXd13079 . for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:38:33 +0100 Received: from mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailserver1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.30]) by mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f18BcW725185 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:38:32 +0100 (MET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C091C3.AB011900" Received: from mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.57]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA12325 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:38:28 +0100 (MET) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f18BcR725176 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:38:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <2.7C5B6DA0@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:38:22 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 488120 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:38:24 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (mail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.234]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA16836 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:38:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA30514 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:38:23 +0100 Received: from zambeze.ujf-grenoble.fr (zambeze.ujf-grenoble.fr [152.77.2.3]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f18BcMu12679 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:38:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from mozart.ujf-grenoble.Fr (mozart.ujf-grenoble.fr [193.54.241.5]) by zambeze.ujf-grenoble.fr (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3/Configured by AD & JE 25/10/1999) with ESMTP id MAA16334 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:38:22 +0100 (MET) Received: (from bouche@localhost) by mozart.ujf-grenoble.Fr (8.9.3/8.8.5) id MAA13991; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:38:21 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: <14978.31798.631846.935627@mira.idris.fr> References: <14978.31798.631846.935627@mira.idris.fr> Return-Path: X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: default inputenc/fontenc tight to language Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 12:38:21 +0100 Message-ID: <200102081138.MAA13991@mozart.ujf-grenoble.Fr> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Thierry Bouche" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: "Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L" Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3746 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C091C3.AB011900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =BB I still use OT1 for French and will continue until new fonts =BB appear in public domain with the same quality as CM fonts for =BB the 128-255 range. yes, you're the third french user group yourself... I thought you'd use VDC... zefonts.sty provides (almost) full T1, with good looking guillemets, in type 1 if required, and the original knuth design of CM fonts as long as the glyph was designed... AE fonts are more standard but lack a few things in type 1. Th. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C091C3.AB011900 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: default inputenc/fontenc tight to language

=BB I still use OT1 for French and will continue until = new fonts
=BB appear in public domain with the same quality as = CM fonts for
=BB the 128-255 range.

yes, you're the third french user group = yourself...

I thought you'd use VDC... zefonts.sty provides = (almost) full T1, with
good looking guillemets, in type 1 if required, and = the original knuth
design of CM fonts as long as the glyph was = designed... AE fonts are
more standard but lack a few things in type 1.

Th.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C091C3.AB011900--