Received: from webgate.proteosys.de (mail.proteosys-ag.com [62.225.9.49]) by lucy.proteosys (8.11.0/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id f0UHie713513 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:44:40 +0100 Received: by webgate.proteosys.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f0UHjR727740 . for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:45:27 +0100 Received: from mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailserver1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.30]) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f0UHidM12318 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:44:39 +0100 (MET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C08AE4.520AF400" Received: from mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.56]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA23504 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:44:38 +0100 (MET) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f0UHicM12314 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:44:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <12.25F14F2D@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:44:32 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 485954 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:44:31 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (mail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.234]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA29801 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:44:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA55900 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:44:30 +0100 Received: from zambeze.ujf-grenoble.fr (zambeze.ujf-grenoble.fr [152.77.2.3]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f0UHiTp12672 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:44:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from mozart.ujf-grenoble.Fr (mozart.ujf-grenoble.fr [193.54.241.5]) by zambeze.ujf-grenoble.fr (Pro-8.9.3/8.9.3/Configured by AD & JE 25/10/1999) with ESMTP id SAA26067 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:44:29 +0100 (MET) Received: (from bouche@localhost) by mozart.ujf-grenoble.Fr (8.9.3/8.8.5) id SAA16417; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:44:28 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: <14965.53535.903052.219374@istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de> References: <14965.53535.903052.219374@istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de> Return-Path: X-Mailer: VM 6.22 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: default font encoding Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:44:28 +0100 Message-ID: <200101301744.SAA16417@mozart.ujf-grenoble.Fr> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Thierry Bouche" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: "Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L" Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3670 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C08AE4.520AF400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Imho, either we can get rid of all O** encodings, including maths, or it's only a not very usefull way to overload ctt with cries. And the t1 (type 1) issue is quite relevant, here. I have been using default T1 formats for years, and switched back to OT1 by default because users didn't understand why their source files were not properly treated elsewhere... Th. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C08AE4.520AF400 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: default font encoding

Imho, either we can get rid of all O** encodings, = including maths, or
it's only a not very usefull way to overload ctt with = cries.

And the t1 (type 1) issue is quite relevant, = here.

I have been using default T1 formats for years, and = switched back to
OT1 by default because users didn't understand why = their source files
were not properly treated elsewhere...

Th.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C08AE4.520AF400--