Received: via tmail-4.1(11) (invoked by user schoepf) for schoepf; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:39:49 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.56]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA24488 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:39:49 +0200 (MEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.11.0/8.10.2) with ESMTP id e8SLdmG02911 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:39:48 +0200 (MET DST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C02994.A0708080" Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <9.DA4BAAC3@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:39:48 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 472007 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:39:46 +0200 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (mail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.234]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA02360 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:39:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA31950 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:39:45 +0200 Received: from musse.tninet.se (musse.tninet.se [195.100.94.12]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA09890 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:39:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 2937 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2000 23:39:44 +0200 Received: from garibaldi.tninet.se (HELO algonet.se) (195.100.94.103) by musse.tninet.se with SMTP; 28 Sep 2000 23:39:44 +0200 Received: from [195.100.226.145] (du145-226.ppp.su-anst.tninet.se [195.100.226.145]) by garibaldi.tninet.se (BLUETAIL Mail Robustifier 2.2.1) with ESMTP id 714659.177182.970garibaldi-s0 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:39:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Your message of "Thu, 28 Sep 2000 21:42:33 +0200." Return-Path: X-Sender: haberg@pop.matematik.su.se Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Re: what is and what isn't meet for this list (was Diacritical marks) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 22:39:15 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "Hans Aberg" Sender: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" To: "Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L" Reply-To: "Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project" Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3622 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C02994.A0708080 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 21.26 +0100 0-09-28, Robin Fairbairns wrote: >i'm afraid you're wrong. \we (before my time) set up this list as a >means to discuss the future of latex in the development of latex 3. >some time back, i suspect before you were on the scene, there was >another mailing list for discussing the development of latex 2e; that >list has now been closed --- the decisions about what's to be in 2e >have all been made long since. anything that's definitely missing >from the conception of of latex2e may be a candidate for a bug report >(category: change request), I remember now: it took so long time for \them at arriving at LaTeX3 = that I forgot about it. :-) I also remember the old LaTeX2e list that somehow = was dismissed. >if you want a more nearly rational encoding, i would strongly >recommend investigating ly1, for which a full set of bits and pieces >is to be found on the archives, written for and placed in the public >arena by[*], y&y. Thank you for the pointer. But actually, I am more curious about what Taco Hoekwater will come up with, the new fonts defined for the Unicode/STIX submission (as = discussed in the math fonts list). Hans Aberg ------_=_NextPart_001_01C02994.A0708080 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Re: what is and what isn't meet for this list (was = Diacritical marks)

At 21.26 +0100 0-09-28, Robin Fairbairns wrote:
>i'm afraid you're wrong.  \we (before my = time) set up this list as a
>means to discuss the future of latex in the = development of latex 3.
>some time back, i suspect before you were on the = scene, there was
>another mailing list for discussing the = development of latex 2e; that
>list has now been closed --- the decisions about = what's to be in 2e
>have all been made long since.  anything = that's definitely missing
>from the conception of of latex2e may be a = candidate for a bug report
>(category: change request),

I remember now: it took so long time for \them at = arriving at LaTeX3 that I
forgot about it. :-) I also remember the old LaTeX2e = list that somehow was
dismissed.

>if you want a more nearly rational encoding, i = would strongly
>recommend investigating ly1, for which a full set = of bits and pieces
>is to be found on the archives, written for and = placed in the public
>arena by[*], y&y.

Thank you for the pointer.

But actually, I am more curious about what Taco = Hoekwater will come up
with, the new fonts defined for the Unicode/STIX = submission (as discussed
in the math fonts list).

  Hans Aberg

------_=_NextPart_001_01C02994.A0708080--