X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["496" "Wed" "15" "December" "1999" "11:26:15" "+0000" "Robin Fairbairns" "Robin.Fairbairns@CL.CAM.AC.UK" nil "16" "Re: Is help available here?" "^Date:" nil nil "12" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(11) (invoked by user schoepf) for schoepf; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:26:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (trudi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.159]) by mailserver2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA08778 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:26:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA23748 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:26:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <1.0C8D15A9@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:26:17 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 445792 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:25:35 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA09887 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:25:33 +0100 (MET) Received: from wisbech.cl.cam.ac.uk (mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk [128.232.0.15]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA25763 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:26:07 +0100 (MET) Received: from dorceus.cl.cam.ac.uk ([128.232.1.34] helo=cl.cam.ac.uk ident=rf) by wisbech.cl.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.092 #1) id 11yCZW-0007FG-00 for LATEX-L@URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:26:18 +0000 Message-ID: Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:09:58 +0100." Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:26:15 +0000 From: Robin Fairbairns Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: Is help available here? Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3462 > (Sorry for answering this thread.) hah! > >> Not true, I am afraid. The royalties are split between the 3 authors only. > > >Is that necessarily a contradiction? > > It depends on whether one is deceptive or not: [...] oh for goodness' sake -- i made a simple mistake, that's all. please let's drop it. pseudo-philosophical discussions of my mental state at the time i made the mistake are wildly off-topic for this list -- try usenet alt.psychology.mistake-theory, or some such place. r