X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["834" "Wed" "15" "December" "1999" "12:15:19" "+0100" "Phillip Helbig" "helbig@MAN.AC.UK" nil "14" "Re: Is help available here?" "^Date:" nil nil "12" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Return-Path: Received: via tmail-4.1(11) (invoked by user schoepf) for schoepf; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:15:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (trudi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.159]) by mailserver2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA08715 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:15:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA17055 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:15:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <8.840DE144@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:15:19 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 445787 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:14:36 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de (relay.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.212]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA08792 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:14:34 +0100 (MET) Received: from thales.astro.rug.nl (thales.astro.rug.nl [129.125.6.224]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA24037 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:15:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from gladia.astro.rug.nl (gladia.astro.rug.nl [129.125.6.17]) by thales.astro.rug.nl with SMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.7.1) id MAA25937 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:16:37 +0100 (MET) X-VMS-To: SMTP%"LATEX-L@urz.uni-heidelberg.de" X-VMS-Cc: HELBIG Message-ID: <99121512151928@man.ac.uk> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 12:15:19 +0100 From: Phillip Helbig Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: Is help available here? Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3460 > It depends on whether one is deceptive or not: If the money for the > proceeds goes directly to a person which happens to work at the LaTeX > project, then most would think that it is not in the support of the LaTeX > project specifically, as the person getting the money can do whatever she > pleases with it. Only if the money is specifically earmarked as belonging > in support of the LaTeX project would one expect it to be so. But a > deceptive person would surely label the former case as being the latter > case. Do the `people in the LaTeX 3 project' get paid directly for their work? Or is it a `spare-time' effort? If the latter, the fact that they get royalties keeps them from having to work more elsewhere (assuming that they are not independently wealthy) presumably aids the project by allowing them to work on it.