X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1483" "Sun" "31" "October" "1999" "19:45:26" "+0100" "Frank Mittelbach" "frank.mittelbach@LATEX-PROJECT.ORG" nil "32" "on silence" "^Date:" nil nil "10" nil "on silence" nil nil nil] nil) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA04313 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 21:10:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <5.EFCF80DE@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 21:11:18 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 445081 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 22:11:16 +0200 Received: from mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (root@trudi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.159]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA09960 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 21:11:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de (root@dialin403.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.175.103]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA31896 for ; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 21:10:39 +0100 (MET) Received: (from design@localhost) by istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA00657; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 19:45:26 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de: design set sender to design@istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de using -f References: <199910261251.IAA08223@hilbert.math.albany.edu> Message-ID: <199910311845.TAA00657@istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199910261251.IAA08223@hilbert.math.albany.edu> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 1999 19:45:26 +0100 From: Frank Mittelbach Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: on silence Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3376 William F. Hammond writes: > (Perhaps some who are quiet are busy or do not know quite what to say. > I don't think that the silence indicates a lack of interest.) i can easily believe both of the explanations (or fool myself into it :-) but without feedback and even if the feedback is mainly of the type, please explain this better i don't understand, it is awfully hard to write about this. and if i'm not able to finally get this into a shape where most of you on the list do understand it and/or think it is being useful this is doomed, or not? that is, unless there are the wrong people on the list (or for the wrong reasons) both of which i doubt knowing many of the names or having seen the contributions in the past. what i mainly want to say is, that this list only works with participation, it is *not* the announcement list for the latex3 project but rather your forum to bring in new ideas (as well as to help us getting our ideas into useful shapes for you) as you might notice most of my posts are currently written late at night or on weekends which says something about the amount of time i currently have to work on these issues. as a result my replies to any posts are slow anyway, so i'm quite happy if this list is not suddenly exploding with 20 or more messages per day. but if this work should come to a successful finish (and right now i think there is a good chance) we need as much help as you (plural) can provide. sorry for the aside :-) frank