X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["660" "Fri" "1" "October" "1999" "14:17:29" "+0200" "Frank Mittelbach" "frank.mittelbach@LATEX-PROJECT.ORG" nil "17" "Re: xparse and end-users" "^Date:" nil nil "10" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA11590 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 16:20:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <15.48D86545@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 16:20:05 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 445255 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 16:18:41 +0200 Received: from mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (root@trudi.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.159]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA25996 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 16:18:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de (root@dialin371.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.175.71]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA31648 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 16:20:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from design@localhost) by istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA00608; Fri, 1 Oct 1999 14:17:29 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de: design set sender to design@istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de using -f References: <14323.11449.969779.155196@n15ux24.nets.de.eds.com> <199910011027.MAA00375@istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de> Message-ID: <199910011217.OAA00608@istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199910011027.MAA00375@istrati.zdv.uni-mainz.de> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 14:17:29 +0200 From: Frank Mittelbach Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: xparse and end-users Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3342 Richard Hensh writes: > BTW, there has been some discussion about the Latex Companion in ctt. > Is a revised edition in the works? ;-> yes and no. i view the current work as outline in the talk given in Vancouver the first priority since if these interfaces are available and well-received they will alter the need for certain packages and also alter change what needs to be explained about headings/toc entries etc in the companion revision. so my current plan is to start working on a revision seriously not earlier than late 2000 frank ps: this is a resent of that post because it seems that my mail account was slightly screwed up the last two days