X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["749" "Mon" "6" "September" "1999" "16:45:11" "+0000" "Sebastian Rahtz" "sebastian.rahtz@COMPUTING-SERVICES.OXFORD.AC.UK" nil "23" "Re: Standard journal macros" "^Date:" nil nil "9" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA30956; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 17:49:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <2.A472BDCF@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 17:49:33 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 444229 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 17:48:59 +0200 Received: from oxmail.ox.ac.uk (oxmail4.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.33]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA24890 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 17:48:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ermine.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.13]) by oxmail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 11O11O-0003cB-00 for LATEX-L@urz.uni-heidelberg.de; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 16:49:30 +0100 Received: from spqr.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.15.17] ident=rahtz) by ermine.ox.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11O11N-0000LH-00 for LATEX-L@URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 16:49:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <199909061429.KAA01571@hilbert.math.albany.edu> X-Mailer: VM 6.73 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <14291.61335.34254.496975@spqr.oucs.ox.ac.uk> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199909061429.KAA01571@hilbert.math.albany.edu> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 16:45:11 +0000 From: Sebastian Rahtz Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: Standard journal macros Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3310 William F. Hammond writes: > It is possible to fool ourselves into thinking that we are writing > LaTeX when we are really writing SGML. > now you are talking.... > > Docbook and TEI not good enough? > > Is the dockbook model for "author" adequate? Some things like this > may be both more and less than what we would want. it is an interesting issue of whether a long-established DTD like the TEI has enough markup to describe a 100-author CERN physics paper. I'd be curious to see the results. > Do either provide enough hooks for math? TEI and Docbook are both extensible, so on just plugs in MathML and pray for namespace support (somehow, the mathml people thought it was amusing to have "" in their element set) Sebastian