X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1452" "Tue" "31" "August" "1999" "16:47:14" "+0200" "Marcel Oliver" "oliver@UNI-TUEBINGEN.DE" nil "35" "Re: Standard journal macros" "^Date:" nil nil "8" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (mail.listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.5]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA24174; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:47:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by mail.listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <15.F6DEB2B6@mail.listserv.gmd.de>; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:47:24 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 444157 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:47:02 +0200 Received: from na.uni-tuebingen.de (root@na.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.161.64]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA09508 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:47:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from uni-tuebingen.de (na6 [134.2.161.170]) by na.uni-tuebingen.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA15564 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:47:15 +0200 (MET DST) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.6 sun4m) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <01JFF6Q0OW2Q00076H@ALPHA.NTP.SPRINGER.DE> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <37CBEAF2.5724659B@uni-tuebingen.de> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:47:14 +0200 From: Marcel Oliver Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: Standard journal macros Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3294 Joerg Knappen wrote: > We (i. e. Jens Kloecker, Michael Piotrowski, Frank Holzwarth and JKn) > want to develop a standard _scientific article_ class in a BOF session > at EuroTeX99 to be hold in Heidelberg from September 20--24. This is very encouraging! I think besides the implementation issues, it would be very useful if there would be a document of the sort "Preparing articles for direct electronic submission" as a standard reference. Individual publishers could contribute short appendices for those requirements that are unique to their journals. Could someone put a draft (if it exists) on the web, so that it will be possible to make concrete suggestions? I would be very willing to help out in this respect, either by sending in comments or by co-ordinating some of this. "William F. Hammond" wrote: > Don't you really want an SGML language (formally, "application") that > admits down-translation to LaTeX? There's absolutely no reason why > you cannot have a markup user interface (MUI) for it that has the look > and feel of LaTeX. I remember a loooong discussion on this. I think that the usefulness to effort ratio did not really convince people to commit to this... On the other hand, the submission guidelines could be drafted under the assumption that the back-end is not necessarily LaTeX, and thus the file should be processable as good as reasonably possible by filters that do not operate on the level of TeX. Marcel