X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1023" "Wed" "19" "May" "1999" "16:51:35" "+0200" "Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?=" "Lars.Hellstrom@MATH.UMU.SE" nil "24" "Re: The bugs in the doc package" "^Date:" nil nil "5" nil "The bugs in the doc package" nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA28573; Wed, 19 May 1999 16:51:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.5) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <13.55FC4761@listserv.gmd.de>; Wed, 19 May 1999 16:51:42 +0200 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 431662 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 19 May 1999 16:51:39 +0200 Received: from mail.math.umu.se (root@abel.math.umu.se [130.239.20.139]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA12665 for ; Wed, 19 May 1999 16:51:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from [130.239.20.144] (mac144.math.umu.se [130.239.20.144]) by mail.math.umu.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA21549 for ; Wed, 19 May 1999 16:51:35 +0200 (MET DST) X-Sender: lars@abel.math.umu.se References: (message from Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= on Tue, 18 May 1999 18:01:01 +0200) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de id QAA12673 Message-ID: Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199905181624.RAA23486@nag.co.uk> Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 16:51:35 +0200 From: Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hellstr=F6m?= Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: The bugs in the doc package Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3281 David Carlisle wrote: >In response to your message I just fetched doc.dtx off ctan [snip] >This is using >Package: doc 1999/03/25 v2.0h Standard LaTeX documentation package (FMi) > >which version do you have? Ah, well, it seems I owe you an apology. Appearently, I downloaded v2.0g the very same day it got replaced by v2.0h, my FTP client marked the downloaded file's "last changed" date with the download date, and when I later looked for the fixed version, I mistook it for the one I had, since they were marked by the same date. Bloody stupid mistake, really. But isn't updated files supposed to be listed in the patch file (it didn't say anything about doc.dtx)? [snip] >(by the way, latex-l isn't the bug address) (It wasn't intended as one, although it might have turned out to be something very similar. My reaction was that when bug reports were submitted a month and a half ago, but still nothing has happened, the time for bug reports are over and the time for letters to the editor has come.) Lars Hellström