X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["472" "Sat" "19" "December" "1998" "22:05:53" "+0100" "Hans Aberg" "haberg@MATEMATIK.SU.SE" nil "11" "Re: portable LaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "12" nil "portable LaTeX" nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA08905; Sat, 19 Dec 1998 22:07:11 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <0.56C2AA3E@listserv.gmd.de>; Sat, 19 Dec 1998 22:06:49 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 413528 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Sat, 19 Dec 1998 22:05:26 +0100 Received: from mail0.nada.kth.se (mail0.nada.kth.se [130.237.222.70]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA08266 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 1998 22:05:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from [130.237.37.77] (sl109.modempool.kth.se [130.237.37.135]) by mail0.nada.kth.se (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA02017 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 1998 22:05:22 +0100 (MET) X-Sender: su95-hab@mail.nada.kth.se References: Your message of "Sat, 19 Dec 1998 16:30:31 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 22:05:53 +0100 From: Hans Aberg Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: portable LaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3217 At 15:38 +0000 1998/12/19, Robin Fairbairns wrote: >and it is of course completely irrelevant to the discussion of latex >and/or its portability. Except of course that the OO aspect of proper encapsulation is of paramount importance for these topics... Hans Aberg * Email: Hans Aberg * Home Page: * AMS member listing: