X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["528" "Fri" "18" "December" "1998" "18:16:09" "+0100" "Hans Aberg" "haberg@MATEMATIK.SU.SE" nil "13" "Re: pointless discussions" "^Date:" nil nil "12" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.158]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA09699; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 18:33:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA27505; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 18:33:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <13.747F2B22@listserv.gmd.de>; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 18:19:47 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 413927 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 18:15:59 +0100 Received: from mail0.nada.kth.se (mail0.nada.kth.se [130.237.222.70]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA21902 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 18:15:57 +0100 (MET) Received: from [130.237.37.136] (sl43.modempool.kth.se [130.237.37.63]) by mail0.nada.kth.se (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA15285 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 18:15:55 +0100 (MET) X-Sender: su95-hab@mail.nada.kth.se References: (message from Hans Aberg on Fri, 18 Dec 1998 14:27:00 +0100) (message from Hans Aberg on Fri, 18 Dec 1998 13:23:13 +0100) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199812181333.NAA25766@nag.co.uk> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 18:16:09 +0100 From: Hans Aberg Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: pointless discussions Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3203 At 13:33 +0000 1998/12/18, David Carlisle wrote: >> I find it about as exciting in private conversations as in public >> conversations. > >However, it is normally considered (and in fact, is) impolite to forward >private mail to a public list. Only in the case the conversation is private in nature, I think. Hans Aberg * Email: Hans Aberg * Home Page: * AMS member listing: