X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["1061" "Wed" "16" "December" "1998" "16:15:13" "+0100" "Hans Aberg" "haberg@MATEMATIK.SU.SE" nil "24" "Re: pdf and ps portable LaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "12" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA04492; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 16:14:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <12.952CCC80@listserv.gmd.de>; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 16:14:12 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 413548 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 16:14:08 +0100 Received: from mail0.nada.kth.se (mail0.nada.kth.se [130.237.222.70]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA13249 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 16:14:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from [130.237.37.107] (sl17.modempool.kth.se [130.237.37.37]) by mail0.nada.kth.se (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA03344 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 16:14:03 +0100 (MET) X-Sender: su95-hab@mail.nada.kth.se References: <13938.39518.68424.927988@fell.open.ac.uk> <199812092035.VAA16014@na6.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de> <13941.7255.489674.140731@srahtz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <13943.35834.346967.222803@srahtz> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 16:15:13 +0100 From: Hans Aberg Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: pdf and ps portable LaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3182 At 10:31 +0000 1998/12/16, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: >Knuth is an individual with a bank account, and income and deductions; >Adobe is a corporate entity. "commercial" has no real meaning in this >context I thought you indicated the real meaning of "commercial" in this context... > > But otherwise, Knuth could probably do the same, ubless there is a contract > > with the AMS prohibiting it. > > >good. then we agree that TeX is no more an open language than PDF? The problem with TeX is of course that Knuths sits on the copyright, and nothing happens... Otherwise, I think it is great that Acrobat Reader and part of use of PDF are for free -- I wrote to an Adobe executive in the days they were not and told him they would make more money that by changing that, and he responded that is was a great idea, and after that they changed it. Hans Aberg * Email: Hans Aberg * Home Page: * AMS member listing: