X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["861" "Tue" "15" "December" "1998" "20:20:30" "+0100" "Hans Aberg" "haberg@MATEMATIK.SU.SE" nil "21" "Re: pdf and ps portable LaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "12" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA10759; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 20:25:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <8.4B1A9715@listserv.gmd.de>; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 20:23:51 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 413810 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 20:23:38 +0100 Received: from mail0.nada.kth.se (mail0.nada.kth.se [130.237.222.70]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA07478 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 20:22:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from [130.237.37.111] (sl87.modempool.kth.se [130.237.37.113]) by mail0.nada.kth.se (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA29809 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 20:22:35 +0100 (MET) X-Sender: su95-hab@mail.nada.kth.se References: <13938.39518.68424.927988@fell.open.ac.uk> <199812092035.VAA16014@na6.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de> <13941.7255.489674.140731@srahtz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <13942.19968.751211.688253@srahtz> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 20:20:30 +0100 From: Hans Aberg Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: pdf and ps portable LaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3154 At 11:54 +0000 1998/12/15, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: >in what way does the PDF specification differ from the TeX >specification? Adobe control one, Knuth the other. Knuth gave away the >source code of an implementation, Adobe only give away compiled >versions. thats about it, probably. Adobe is a commercial company; as far as I know, Knuth is not. But otherwise, Knuth could probably do the same, ubless there is a contract with the AMS prohibiting it. > > I just point out how those things work >are you a copyright lawyer, then? Strange comment. You should of course contact your copyright lawyer when you are in doubt. Then let us know. Hans Aberg * Email: Hans Aberg * Home Page: * AMS member listing: