X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["574" "Tue" "15" "December" "1998" "08:36:50" "-0500" "Y&Y, Inc." "support@YANDY.COM" nil "16" "Re: portable LaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "12" nil "portable LaTeX" nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA14941; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 14:37:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <4.E0F6A9B6@listserv.gmd.de>; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 14:37:17 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 413490 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 14:37:11 +0100 Received: from mail-out-0.tiac.net (mail-out-0.tiac.net [199.0.65.247]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA06950 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 14:37:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail-out-3.tiac.net (mail-out-3.tiac.net [199.0.65.15]) by mail-out-0.tiac.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA30444 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 08:37:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from support@YandY.com) Received: from DENALI (p38.tc1.metro.MA.tiac.com [209.61.75.39]) by mail-out-3.tiac.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA11512 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 08:36:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from support@YandY.com) X-Sender: yandy@pop.tiac.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 References: <13941.7255.489674.140731@srahtz> <13938.39518.68424.927988@fell.open.ac.uk> <199812092035.VAA16014@na6.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: <4.1.19981215083339.00ae0750@pop.tiac.net> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 08:36:50 -0500 From: "Y&Y, Inc." Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: portable LaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3143 At 10:55 AM 98/12/14 , Hans Aberg wrote: >Clearly the disadvantage with PDF is that it is a commercial product, and The PDF file format is open. Not proprietary. The fact that Acrobat Distiller and Exchange are commercial means that a lot of development are done on them on a contiuing basis. It is hard to compete with that using time syphoned off from sponsored research projects (so called `free' time). >that it is somewhat too primitive to be used as a WWW-bytecode standard. Regards, Berthold. Y&Y, Inc. http://www.YandY.com/news.htm mailto:support@YandY.com