X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["917" "Tue" "15" "December" "1998" "11:39:06" "+0000" "Sebastian Rahtz" "s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK" nil "18" "Re: portable LaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "12" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA31981; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 13:09:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <13.7527A034@listserv.gmd.de>; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 13:08:23 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 413388 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 13:08:19 +0100 Received: from pillar.elsevier.co.uk (root@pillar.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.222.35]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA28009 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 13:08:14 +0100 (MET) Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]; by pillar.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP; for ""; sender "s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk"; id LAA25374; hop 0; Tue, 15 Dec 1998 11:59:37 GMT Received: from srahtz (actually host srahtz.elsevier.co.uk) by snowdon.elsevier.co.uk with SMTP (PP); Tue, 15 Dec 1998 12:07:38 +0000 X-Mailer: emacs 20.3.2 (via feedmail 9-beta-3 Q); VM 6.61 under Emacs 20.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <13938.39518.68424.927988@fell.open.ac.uk> <199812092035.VAA16014@na6.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de> Message-ID: <13942.19034.339454.14516@srahtz> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 11:39:06 +0000 From: Sebastian Rahtz Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: portable LaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3134 Hans Aberg writes: > Depends: In DVI, such links are shipped out using \special, when converted > to PS, it must be put into a similar box, which later is converted > correctly to PDF. If people sit down and work it out correctly, it may > work, but it is a fragile procedure, as it hangs on a chain of extensions I have maintained a LaTeX package since 1995 which manages this process, supporting half a dozen different backends. Believe me, its not fragile (ok, its not unbreakable!). The bits of it that relate to TeX->DVI->PS->PDF are reliable, well-understood, and supported. > On the other hand, if the format from the beginning understands links (like > PDF), there is no doubt that it will work if the format converted to also > understands links. the PostScript which is fed to Distiller or ps2pdf understands links. so there you go. read up on the pdfmark operator, if you are interested Sebastian