X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["405" "Mon" "14" "December" "1998" "15:26:48" "+0000" "Sebastian Rahtz" "s.rahtz@ELSEVIER.CO.UK" nil "13" "Re: portable LaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "12" nil "portable LaTeX" nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA29960; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 16:43:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <1.5EFE8AFB@listserv.gmd.de>; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 16:43:42 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 413344 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 16:43:30 +0100 Received: from pillar.elsevier.co.uk (root@pillar.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.222.35]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA19119 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 16:43:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from snowdon.elsevier.co.uk [193.131.197.164]; by pillar.elsevier.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP; for ""; sender "s.rahtz@elsevier.co.uk"; id PAA00379; hop 0; Mon, 14 Dec 1998 15:34:39 GMT Received: from srahtz (actually host srahtz.elsevier.co.uk) by snowdon.elsevier.co.uk with SMTP (PP); Mon, 14 Dec 1998 15:42:58 +0000 X-Mailer: emacs 20.3.2 (via feedmail 9-beta-3 Q); VM 6.61 under Emacs 20.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <13938.39518.68424.927988@fell.open.ac.uk> <199812092035.VAA16014@na6.mathematik.uni-tuebingen.de> <199812141457.IAA15514@dcdrjh.fnal.gov> Message-ID: <13941.11832.164081.296097@srahtz> Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <199812141457.IAA15514@dcdrjh.fnal.gov> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 15:26:48 +0000 From: Sebastian Rahtz Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: portable LaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3101 Randolph J. Herber writes: > > Address that problem by using dvips and then ps2pdf, or dvipdf, if do people realize there is now a "dvipdfm" on the free market? not perfect yet, but does pretty well, if thats your bag. follow links on http://www.tug.org/interest.html why i should want to do tex->dvi->dvips->ps2pdf->pdf when i can do tex->pdf, with much higher quality, i am not sure :-} sebastian