X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["2031" "Thu" "10" "December" "1998" "16:18:48" "-0500" "Barbara Beeton" "bnb@AMS.ORG" nil "44" "Re: Public vote!" "^Date:" nil nil "12" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA16573; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:19:16 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <14.95D9CD7F@listserv.gmd.de>; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:19:15 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 412758 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:19:10 +0100 Received: from math.ams.org (math.ams.org [130.44.210.14]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA01828 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 22:19:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from sun06.ams.org by math.ams.org via smtpd (for relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.119.201]) with SMTP; 10 Dec 1998 21:19:00 UT Received: from localhost by sun06.ams.org (PMDF V5.1-10 #27147) with SMTP id <0F3R00F01PVCN6@sun06.ams.org> for LATEX-L@URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 16:18:48 -0500 (EST) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Message-ID: Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: <009D0821.9CF1AC80.130@ROSE.IPM.AC.IR> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 16:18:48 -0500 From: Barbara Beeton Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: Public vote! Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3066 roozbeh pournader suggests that a poll be taken to find out what packages are actually used with latex. sounds to me like a reasonable idea. if someone will put together a questionnaire, i will be happy to publish it in the december issue of tugboat. (we're trying to get the camera copy out by christmas, so if it's to be done, the text should be in hand no later than the end of next week.) it's probably possible to set up a mail drop at the tug site so that e-mail returns can be collected or forwarded from there to whoever will do the analysis. a postal address would also be a good idea, as some tugboat readers still don't have good net connections. tugboat would also be a suitable place to report the results of the survey. -- barbara beeton -------------------- On Thu, 10 Dec 1998, Roozbeh Pournader wrote: > Dear all, > The problem of one package being popular or not has been the discussion > in the background of the list for some time. I remember the speech > about psfrag, natbib, etc. But a little question: Are we the users? > We are usually the programmers. Even a math-oriented person like Robin > Fairbains is now a CTAN maintainer! > > I think preparation of some question forms for distribution between LaTeX > users will have a great outcome. We can know which parts are used more, > and which parts less. This is somehow like taking a vote. So we can know > which package they use and love, which packages the use and hate, > which package they haven't heard of, which feature they like to see > in the future, etc. etc. > > I know that some of us recommend them the use of some packages by making them > available on distributions (ranging from emTeX to TeXlive), but let's > forget that effect now. > > --Roozbeh > > P.S.: There has been always a problem in undemocratic societies (like my > home country): there have always been some people who think they know what > others need, and/or like; but they are usually wrong.