X-VM-v5-Data: ([nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil nil] ["259" "Wed" "2" "December" "1998" "16:11:11" "+0000" "Robin Fairbairns" "Robin.Fairbairns@CL.CAM.AC.UK" nil "7" "Re: What is \"base\" LaTeX" "^Date:" nil nil "12" nil nil nil nil nil] nil) Received: from kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (root@kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.8.158]) by mail.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA23768; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 17:32:53 +0100 (MET) Received: from listserv.gmd.de (listserv.gmd.de [192.88.97.1]) by kralle.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA13621; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 17:11:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from lsv1.listserv.gmd.de (192.88.97.2) by listserv.gmd.de (LSMTP for OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <1.3F163C64@listserv.gmd.de>; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 17:11:21 +0100 Received: from RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE by RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8b) with spool id 412653 for LATEX-L@RELAY.URZ.UNI-HEIDELBERG.DE; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 17:11:16 +0100 Received: from heaton.cl.cam.ac.uk (exim@heaton.cl.cam.ac.uk [128.232.32.11]) by relay.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA15290 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 17:11:12 +0100 (MET) Received: from dorceus.cl.cam.ac.uk (cl.cam.ac.uk) [128.232.1.34] (rf) by heaton.cl.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.82 #1) id 0zlErw-0005Xp-00; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 16:11:12 +0000 Message-ID: Reply-To: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 02 Dec 1998 13:54:01 GMT." <199812021354.NAA17023@lurgmhor.elsevier.co.uk> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 16:11:11 +0000 From: Robin Fairbairns Sender: Mailing list for the LaTeX3 project To: Multiple recipients of list LATEX-L Subject: Re: What is "base" LaTeX Status: R X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3025 it appears that an earlier response of mine, comparing hans aberg to rebecca and rowland (who also used to make what i considered unreasonable attacks on sebastian) went to the list. this was, i need hardly say, a mistake on my part, and i apologise. robin